2020
DOI: 10.1111/cen.14140
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing normality–persisting barriers: Current socio‐demographic characteristics of 350 individuals diagnosed with gender dysphoria

Abstract: Introduction The number of individuals requesting medical treatment for gender dysphoria has increased significantly within the past years. Our purpose was to examine current biographic and socio‐demographic characteristics and aspects of legal gender reassignment. Design Medical files from n = 350 individuals of a German Endocrine outpatient clinic were collected from 2009 to 2017 and analysed retrospectively. Results Ratio of transwomen to transmen equates to 1:1.89 with a remarkable increase of transmen by … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The QualSyst score ranged from 0.68 to 0.91 (M = 0.71) for quantitative studies [ 28 , 34 , 46 , 50 , 53 , 54 , 58 , 59 ] (see “ Table 3 ”) with an average summary score of 0.77 (SD = 0.08); overall, a score closer to 1 indicates a better quality. For the qualitative studies [ 26 , 35 , 48 , 52 , 56 , 57 ] (see “ Table 4 ”), the overall summary score (QualSyst tool) ranged from 0.19 to 1.0 (M = 0.85, x = 0.70, SD = 0.27): only two studies, with a very distinct study design (report of HR organization, single interview) were of very low (0.19) [ 52 ] to low quality (0.50) [ 57 ], while the remainder were of good to very good quality.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The QualSyst score ranged from 0.68 to 0.91 (M = 0.71) for quantitative studies [ 28 , 34 , 46 , 50 , 53 , 54 , 58 , 59 ] (see “ Table 3 ”) with an average summary score of 0.77 (SD = 0.08); overall, a score closer to 1 indicates a better quality. For the qualitative studies [ 26 , 35 , 48 , 52 , 56 , 57 ] (see “ Table 4 ”), the overall summary score (QualSyst tool) ranged from 0.19 to 1.0 (M = 0.85, x = 0.70, SD = 0.27): only two studies, with a very distinct study design (report of HR organization, single interview) were of very low (0.19) [ 52 ] to low quality (0.50) [ 57 ], while the remainder were of good to very good quality.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Less than half of the selected articles reported on employment status (9/20) [ 16 , 46 , 47 , 50 , 53 55 , 58 , 59 ] and employment type (6/20) [ 16 , 26 , 35 , 47 , 55 , 59 ] of transgender people. Data on RTW was even more scarce to nonexistent in the case of RTW rates at several time measurements or as a dichotomous variable during transition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations