2016
DOI: 10.1002/2015gl067613
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing influence of air temperature on upper Colorado River streamflow

Abstract: This empirical study examines the influence of precipitation, temperature, and antecedent soil moisture on upper Colorado River basin (UCRB) water year streamflow over the past century. While cool season precipitation explains most of the variability in annual flows, temperature appears to be highly influential under certain conditions, with the role of antecedent fall soil moisture less clear. In both wet and dry years, when flow is substantially different than expected given precipitation, these factors can … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

19
153
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(174 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
19
153
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although climate model projections suggest a decrease in UCRB streamflow in part because of increases in temperature (Christensen et al 2004;Christensen and Lettenmaier 2007;Hoerling and Eischeid 2007;McCabe and Wolock 2007;Vano et al 2014;Ficklin et al 2013;Kopytkovskiy et al 2015;Udall and Overpeck 2017), there has been only sparse research that has qualitatively or quantitatively documented a negative effect of increases in temperature on UCRB streamflow in the instrumental record. Woodhouse et al (2016) and Udall and Overpeck (2017) are the only studies to date that have addressed this issue, and they suggest that the effects of projected warming are becoming detectable. Given these previous studies and continued warming in the UCRB (Udall and Overpeck 2017), two critical questions need to be answered, namely, 1) are the effects of temperature on UCRB flow now substantial enough to be discernable amid natural UCRB flow variability, and 2) can these effects be quantified at both annual and seasonal time scales?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Although climate model projections suggest a decrease in UCRB streamflow in part because of increases in temperature (Christensen et al 2004;Christensen and Lettenmaier 2007;Hoerling and Eischeid 2007;McCabe and Wolock 2007;Vano et al 2014;Ficklin et al 2013;Kopytkovskiy et al 2015;Udall and Overpeck 2017), there has been only sparse research that has qualitatively or quantitatively documented a negative effect of increases in temperature on UCRB streamflow in the instrumental record. Woodhouse et al (2016) and Udall and Overpeck (2017) are the only studies to date that have addressed this issue, and they suggest that the effects of projected warming are becoming detectable. Given these previous studies and continued warming in the UCRB (Udall and Overpeck 2017), two critical questions need to be answered, namely, 1) are the effects of temperature on UCRB flow now substantial enough to be discernable amid natural UCRB flow variability, and 2) can these effects be quantified at both annual and seasonal time scales?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They attribute at least one-third of the decrease in UCRB streamflow during this period to increased temperature. Woodhouse et al (2016) and Udall and Overpeck (2017) are the first studies to show a negative effect of recent warming on UCRB streamflow in the instrumental record. Although climate model projections suggest a decrease in UCRB streamflow in part because of increases in temperature (Christensen et al 2004;Christensen and Lettenmaier 2007;Hoerling and Eischeid 2007;McCabe and Wolock 2007;Vano et al 2014;Ficklin et al 2013;Kopytkovskiy et al 2015;Udall and Overpeck 2017), there has been only sparse research that has qualitatively or quantitatively documented a negative effect of increases in temperature on UCRB streamflow in the instrumental record.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, sensitivity of water budget to climate change may be discrepant across time and space. Although the possible underestimation of the influence of temperature in altering regional water resources has been discussed recently (Sospedra-Alfonso et al, 2015;Woodhouse et al, 2016), a comprehensive evaluation under different climate backgrounds and land-cover compositions is still lacking.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%