2017
DOI: 10.1039/c6ay03363f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing flame ionization detector (FID) sensitivity using post-column oxidation–methanation

Abstract: Combining a microreactor with the flame ionization detector (FID) greatly increases its response to highly oxidized organic molecules.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, by applying Eq. , the carbon content and concentration can be easily determined without calibration and known response factors, simply by incorporating an internal standard (std) (IS) : RF =1= mol C/ area mol 0.33emnormalC std / are normala std mol 0.33emnormalC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, by applying Eq. , the carbon content and concentration can be easily determined without calibration and known response factors, simply by incorporating an internal standard (std) (IS) : RF =1= mol C/ area mol 0.33emnormalC std / are normala std mol 0.33emnormalC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11][12][13][14] Applications of postcolumn reaction GC-FID systems have also been reported by other research groups. [15][16][17][18][19] In this system, target components separated by column are completely converted to carbon dioxide at the oxidizing part and then completely reduced to methane, followed by detection using the FID. Therefore, the sensitivity is proportional to the number of carbon atoms of a target component, irrespective of the compound, and it is not necessary to prepare all the standard materials related to the target components to calibrate the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,14 Applications for measuring NOCs have been reported before. [17][18][19] However, performances of the determined values were not sufficient in accuracy and precision. The reported result had a too large error (over 8% relative) 17 compared with the hydrocarbons measurement results (relative standard uncertainties of measured values: 0.15 -2.10%), 15 and the obtained value was not proportional to the number of carbon atoms in the target component (the effective carbon number was 0.96 ± 0.01, not 1.00), 18 therefore it is presumed that there was some bias or fault in the results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of special interest are organic mixtures rich in heteroatoms, including oxygen, sulfur, and nitrogen, which are more difficult to separate and detect by conventional gas chromatography techniques . Conventional detection of eluting compounds by flame ionization detection (FID) is significantly limited in quantifying chemicals with heteroatoms; for example, some oxygenates such as formaldehyde or formic acid are almost undetectable . Advanced gas chromatography methods that address both limitations and enable rapid quantitative analysis of complex mixtures containing a large number of organic compounds are in high demand for applications in biofuels, clean water, and new consumer products …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%