2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-017-1203-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing efficiency of MRE for diagnosis of Crohn’s disease activity through proper sequence selection: a practical approach for clinical trials

Abstract: T2-weighted sequences should be used as a first screening step, and followed by contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences only when abnormal findings are identified; adding DWI does not improve the accuracy of MRE.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous studies indicated that mural T2 hyperintensity and bowel wall thickness were independent predictors of CD activity assessed by hispathological evaluation [11825]. Higher mural T2 signal, probably reflecting mural edema, was found to be associated with higher degrees of inflammation [182526]. Similarly, this study found a significant association with T2 signal hyperintensity and disease activity, particularly when this parameter is combined with DWI score.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Previous studies indicated that mural T2 hyperintensity and bowel wall thickness were independent predictors of CD activity assessed by hispathological evaluation [11825]. Higher mural T2 signal, probably reflecting mural edema, was found to be associated with higher degrees of inflammation [182526]. Similarly, this study found a significant association with T2 signal hyperintensity and disease activity, particularly when this parameter is combined with DWI score.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The main characteristics of each of the studies [32,[52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60] evaluating the ability of the MaRIA score to diagnose active bowel disease in CD are summarized in Table III. Recently, Erden et al [60] have evaluated the MaRIA score in patients with entero-enteric fistulas and found no significant difference between patients with fistulas from those without fistulas. A potential limitation of the MaRIA is that it does not take into account the overall length of inflamed segments, even in the small bowel where extensive disease can occur.…”
Section: Magnetic Resonance Index Of Activity (Maria)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The estimation of activity using the MaRIA score also correlated with endoscopy findings. More recently, in 2017, the same group [54] compared the accuracy of MRE and MaRIA score versus ileocolonoscopy performed within 1 month. For detecting active disease, a combination of T2-weighted and DWI sequences resulted in the highest specificity and most accurate sequence combination, and had similar sensitivity to those of the MaRIA but a lower specificity and accuracy than the MaRIA score.…”
Section: ) Mre As An Alternative Technique To Endoscopymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although endoscopy is the current gold standard for activity assessment, standardised imaging criteria also depict and quantify inflammatory burden (32)(33)(34). The magnetic resonance of activity (MaRIA) score is perhaps best known, and was derived by correlating various MR features with the Crohn's Disease Endoscopic Index of severity (CDEIS) score (35).…”
Section: Activity Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%