2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41558-020-0763-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing contribution of peatlands to boreal evapotranspiration in a warming climate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
96
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

5
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(100 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
2
96
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As Sphagnum is considered a keystone species for peat formation (Van Breemen, 1995), there may exist a critical depth threshold that must be exceeded for many locations on the landscape for the production of Sphagnum peat to continue, despite seasonal meteorological drought. With summer water deficits being expected to increase in many peatland dominated regions (e.g., Granath et al, 2016;Helbig et al, 2020) under climate change, this could potentially lead to an ecological shift in peatlands from a Sphagnum dominated system to one dominated by forests (Dang & Lieffers, 1989;Kettridge et al, 2015) or more drought tolerant mosses, such as Polytrichum species (Benscoter & Vitt, 2008;Laine et al, 1995). This then leads to two important ecohydrological ques- An answer to these questions could simply be time, where deep sites initiated earlier than shallow sites.…”
Section: Implications For Peatland Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As Sphagnum is considered a keystone species for peat formation (Van Breemen, 1995), there may exist a critical depth threshold that must be exceeded for many locations on the landscape for the production of Sphagnum peat to continue, despite seasonal meteorological drought. With summer water deficits being expected to increase in many peatland dominated regions (e.g., Granath et al, 2016;Helbig et al, 2020) under climate change, this could potentially lead to an ecological shift in peatlands from a Sphagnum dominated system to one dominated by forests (Dang & Lieffers, 1989;Kettridge et al, 2015) or more drought tolerant mosses, such as Polytrichum species (Benscoter & Vitt, 2008;Laine et al, 1995). This then leads to two important ecohydrological ques- An answer to these questions could simply be time, where deep sites initiated earlier than shallow sites.…”
Section: Implications For Peatland Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rydin et al, 2013). There is a concern, however, that Sphagnum mosses and their associated peatland carbon stocks may be vulnerable to future climate change due to enhanced peat decomposition and moss moisture stress (Dorrepaal et al, 2009; Ise et al, 2008), where summer water deficits are predicted to increase substantially within the next century (Granath et al, 2016; Helbig et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The slight overestimates in the diurnal change in mixing ratio were apparent in the high range of the diurnal change (Figure 4f). Evapotranspiration in boreal forests was lower than that in boreal peatlands (Helbig et al, 2020) and did not differ between shrubs and woodlands (Beringer et al, 2005) or lakes (McFadden et al, 2003). The surface representativeness of the study sites could be a reason for the overestimates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Although hydrological restoration of peatlands has been implemented throughout Europe and North America (Lamers et al, 2015), rewetted peatlands are under pressure from climate change (Levison et al, 2014). Shifting precipitation patterns and increasing evapotranspiration resulting from global warming may further degrade peatlands (Tarnocai, 2009;Nijp et al, 2015;Helbig et al, 2020). However, the impact of a changing climate on peatland ecohydrology through extreme weather events such as droughts is likely not uniform over different spatial scales and climatic zones.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%