2021
DOI: 10.1016/s1473-3099(21)00456-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing clindamycin resistance in group A streptococcus

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of clindamycin for skin and soft tissue infections is generally predicated on its activity against MRSA, as well as its anti-toxin effects, excellent penetration into soft tissues, and efficacy in killing bacteria in the stationary phase of growth [21,22]. Resistance rates of Group A Streptococci to clindamycin vary widely from 4 to 40% [17] and are on the increase [23]; hence, this agent is rarely used as monotherapy without knowledge of local antibiograms. The use of clindamycin alongside an anti-Staphylococcal backbone agent for complex S. aureus infections with associated bacteraemia has been evaluated via a pilot multi-centred randomised controlled trial in adults and children [24] and has been incorporated as a key arm of an ongoing adaptive platform trial (S. aureus Network Adaptive Platform (SNAP) trial) [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The use of clindamycin for skin and soft tissue infections is generally predicated on its activity against MRSA, as well as its anti-toxin effects, excellent penetration into soft tissues, and efficacy in killing bacteria in the stationary phase of growth [21,22]. Resistance rates of Group A Streptococci to clindamycin vary widely from 4 to 40% [17] and are on the increase [23]; hence, this agent is rarely used as monotherapy without knowledge of local antibiograms. The use of clindamycin alongside an anti-Staphylococcal backbone agent for complex S. aureus infections with associated bacteraemia has been evaluated via a pilot multi-centred randomised controlled trial in adults and children [24] and has been incorporated as a key arm of an ongoing adaptive platform trial (S. aureus Network Adaptive Platform (SNAP) trial) [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overuse of clindamycin, vancomycin and gentamicin was associated with a 50% increased risk of an SSI versus cefazolin monotherapy [61]. This may be due clindamycin resistance by both Group A streptococci and S. aureus being near 50% in many regions [62 ▪ ,63]. Clindamycin also has an increased risk of C. difficile infection in this population [62 ▪ ].…”
Section: Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxismentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The latter typically includes a β-lactam (e.g., piperacillin/tazobactam), while the former includes clindamycin ( 13, 17, 18 ), which at sublethal concentrations in vitro, inhibits expression of several tissue-damaging toxins. However, the use of clindamycin is now threatened by increasing rates of resistance in healthcare settings ( 1719 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%