2015
DOI: 10.1093/forestry/cpv034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing carbon sinks in European forests: effects of afforestation and changes in mean growing stock volume

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies of the time trend in observations of NEBP are rare, and attribution of variation to natural stand recovery, sampling artifacts, management, the legacy of past disturbances, and anthropogenic environmental change remains a topic in development and debate [ Caspersen et al ., ; Joos et al ., ; Krankina et al ., ; Foster et al ., ; McMahon et al ., ; Price et al ., ; Vilén et al ., ; Zhang et al ., ]. In this study, we outlined a methodology for attributing temporal variation in observed biomass fluxes directly from the results of linear mixed‐effects models based on the convention of temporal forcings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Studies of the time trend in observations of NEBP are rare, and attribution of variation to natural stand recovery, sampling artifacts, management, the legacy of past disturbances, and anthropogenic environmental change remains a topic in development and debate [ Caspersen et al ., ; Joos et al ., ; Krankina et al ., ; Foster et al ., ; McMahon et al ., ; Price et al ., ; Vilén et al ., ; Zhang et al ., ]. In this study, we outlined a methodology for attributing temporal variation in observed biomass fluxes directly from the results of linear mixed‐effects models based on the convention of temporal forcings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies conducted on field plot samples face general uncertainty in the attribution of temporal variation to various causes. The contributions of natural regeneration following disturbance, changes in management activities, and anthropogenic growth enhancement are not well understood [ Caspersen et al ., ; Schimel et al ., ; Pacala et al ., ; Krankina et al ., ; Hember et al ., ; Williams et al ., ; Erb et al ., ; Vilén et al ., ]. In some measurement networks, forest productivity is assumed to be in steady state and so there appears to be little emphasis on trying to partition actual temporal variation into components representing intrinsic factors (e.g., natural patterns of stand regeneration) and extrinsic factors (e.g., environmental change).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This triggered the widespread loss of traditional agricultural landscapes (Fischer et al 2012) and, together with active afforestation efforts, has increased the forest area by about 25% since the 1950s (Gold et al 2006, Fuchs et al 2013. In the same period, the growing stock in Europe's forests doubled (Gold et al 2006, Vilén et al 2015, due to nitrogen deposition, and climate change and changes in forest management practices (Ciais et al 2008, Erb et al 2013b, Pretzsch et al 2014. Finally, Europe expanded its conservation network substantially (Jones-Walters and Čivić 2013), and concerns about the environmental costs of intensification have resulted in a growing emphasis on multifunctionality, for example through agrienvironmental and set-aside schemes (Tscharntke et al 2011, Whittingham 2011.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Forest ecosystems play a significant role in climate change mitigation by the uptake of a substantial portion of carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) from the atmosphere as well as their long-term deposition into biomass and soil [1,2]. Afforestation has proven to be an effective method for increasing C stocks [3][4][5]. However, the growth of the economy and the population drove up demand for forest products, facilitating forest conversion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%