Increasing broad-spectrum aquatic invasive species early detection program efficiency through biased site selection and gear allocation

Abstract

Invasive species cause severe environmental and economic damage throughout the globe. Aside from preventing their introduction, early detection of newly introduced species is the most successful method to prevent their establishment, spread, and eventual negative impacts. Broad-spectrum monitoring for the early detection of novel non-native species is oftentimes heavily burdened by the inherent difficulty in maximizing the detection probabilities of numerous high priority species simultaneously with only finite resources. We attempted to increase the efficiency of broad-spectrum monitoring in four locations across Lake Erie (USA)—the Detroit River, Maumee Bay, Sandusky Bay, and Cleveland—by targeting our site and gear selections to maximize overall species richness and detection rates of rare and non-native species, with the results compared to a random sampling design. Overall species richness was significantly higher in all four locations, while non-native species detection rates were significantly higher in every location except for Cleveland. Detection rates of rare species was significantly higher in Maumee Bay only. Our results indicate this selective sampling design is more likely to detect a newly introduced non-native species than a random sampling design and are in support of the established literature for broad-spectrum monitoring for novel aquatic invasive species.