2007
DOI: 10.1007/s12032-007-9003-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increasing access to medical oncology consultation in older patients with stage II-IIIA non-small-cell lung cancer

Abstract: Background-Resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was once considered a disease whose sole therapy was surgical resection. Therefore it was managed by surgeons. However, with growing evidence of the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy, such patients should also be evaluated by a medical oncologist.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have found that MDT management plans show good concordance with evidence based guidelines [9,11,38], and that MDTs increase overall treatment rates, probably through the consideration of more patients with borderline stage or fitness for intervention [37,39,40]. Some authors have also reported improvements in survival [39,49], but could not account for confounding by other advances or improvements in the care of patients with thoracic malignancies.…”
Section: Benefits For the Patientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have found that MDT management plans show good concordance with evidence based guidelines [9,11,38], and that MDTs increase overall treatment rates, probably through the consideration of more patients with borderline stage or fitness for intervention [37,39,40]. Some authors have also reported improvements in survival [39,49], but could not account for confounding by other advances or improvements in the care of patients with thoracic malignancies.…”
Section: Benefits For the Patientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As there exists no standard protocol in how to define providers and locations, the definitions vary across studies. Some have used specialty codes to identify providers [ 14 16 ]. One paper used billing codes [ 17 ] and another used both billing and specialty codes [ 5 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%