1997
DOI: 10.1017/s0813483900003478
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increases in the Communicative Behaviours of Students with Cerebral Palsy as a Result of Feedback to, and the Selection of Goals by, Paraprofessionals

Abstract: The employment of untrained paraprofessionals to support children with disabilities in educational settings is not uncommon. Although urgently needed, research on effective methods of increasing the skills of these paraprofessionals is scarce. This study, which was conducted over 3 academic years, assessed the effectiveness of incorporating naturalistic prompting strategies by paraprofessionals for increasing target communicative behaviours of students with severe spastic quadriplegic cerebral palsy. A concurr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although this is the first study to show that focused training can enable a paraprofessional to implement video prompting with error correction, our findings align with other studies that show similar training can enable paraprofessionals to effectively implement evidence-based practices. These findings further align with paraprofessional training on other types of procedures such as discrete trial training (e.g., Leblanc, Ricciardi, & Luiselli, 2005), pivotal response training (Robinson, 2011), and prompting (e.g., Hall & Macvean, 1997). This is also only one of a handful of studies that demonstrated the maintained effects of a focused training.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Although this is the first study to show that focused training can enable a paraprofessional to implement video prompting with error correction, our findings align with other studies that show similar training can enable paraprofessionals to effectively implement evidence-based practices. These findings further align with paraprofessional training on other types of procedures such as discrete trial training (e.g., Leblanc, Ricciardi, & Luiselli, 2005), pivotal response training (Robinson, 2011), and prompting (e.g., Hall & Macvean, 1997). This is also only one of a handful of studies that demonstrated the maintained effects of a focused training.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…As can be seen in Table 3, a combination of feedback, behavioral consequences, and goal setting was used in one study. At the beginning of the intervention condition, Hall and Macvean (1997) had paraprofessionals select the types of prompts they would use and the number of times during each observation they would prompt a child's target behavior. During the feedback meetings in the intervention condition, the paraprofessionals were provided with graphs displaying the number of intervals in which they used the selected prompt and the occurrence of the child's target behavior.…”
Section: Feedback Combinationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both studies used similar feedback procedures, and both achieved positive changes in staff and client behavior, but the former showed larger and more stable gains. Hall and Macvean (1997) used self-selection of targets and supervisory feedback to increase staff prompts and students' communicative behavior. Staff self-selected the number of times they were to prompt per session, but importantly, all the selected targets, except for one, were within the speech consultant's recommendations.…”
Section: Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies have shown that without self-generated feedback staff required frequent posttraining supervisory feedback, ranging from twice a week to once every two weeks, for staff and client behavior to be maintained (e.g., Green, Reid, Perkins, & Gardner, 1991;Hall & Macvean, 1997;Harchik, Sherman, Sheldon, & Strouse, 1992;Hrydowy & Martin, 1994;Ivancic, Reid, Iwata, Faw, & Page, 1981;Methot, Williams, Cummings, & Bradshaw, 1996;Page, Iwata, & Reid, 1982). Arguably, self-generated feedback should enhance generalization of staff performance by evoking and reinforcing behavior that would otherwise not occur in the absence of supervisors.…”
Section: Self-generated Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%