Increases in Business Investment Rates in OECD Countries in the 1990s: How Much Can be Explained by Fundamentals?

Abstract

Increases in business investment rates in OECD countries in the 1990s:How much can be explained by fundamentals?In several OECD countries, investment rates in the business sector grew strongly in the second half of the 1990s. In some cases, the strength of private investment relative to output growth had raised concerns about the risk of capital overhang and the prospect of a prolonged period of slow capital formation in order to bring investment levels back to more sustainable levels. It is possible that the stock market boom has contributed to a rise of investment demand to an excessive level, not only in the United States, but also in the United Kingdom, Canada, Scandinavia and Greece. The purpose of this paper is to assess the contribution of fundamental determinants to the change in investment in the second half of the 1990s, based on the estimation of panel cointegration equations for gross business investment for 18 OECD countries from 1970 to 1999. In addition to the levels of real GDP and a measure of the cost of capital, the set of explanatory variables includes four alternative proxies for financial market development. The inclusion of the latter variables helps to identify a coefficient for output that is close to one as well as a coefficient for the cost of capital that is both negative and significant. Based on these estimation results, the rise in the volume of business investment observed in a number of countries during the second half of the 1990s can only be partly explained by the set of basic determinants. On that basis, the empirical analysis would tend to support the view that investment had exceeded its steady-state level, not least in the United States. However, as suggested by the recent pick-up in investment, the size of the capital overhang in the United States might turn out to be smaller than feared, especially once the increases in trend output growth and depreciation rates are taken into account.

Does funding of pensions stimulate economic growth?

“…As noted above, it is arbitrary to choose the length of leads and lags in the DOLS model, but the practice is to use one or two leads/lags (Mark and Sul, 2002 ;Kao et al, 1999). In this paper, in order to check the robustness of DOLS model as in Pelgrin et al (2002), we used both one lead/lag and two leads/lags. We split our dataset according to two dimensions, i.e.…”

Investment Gaps after the Crisis

“…This can be rearranged to show that the long-run desired capital stock depends on output and the real user cost of capital. Assuming further that net investment is a distributed lag process of changes in the desired capital stock (partial adjustment) or, alternatively, that changes in the existing capital stock are associated with adjustment costs, an empirically-tractable equation without the existing capital stock can be obtained (Bean, 1981;Pelgrin et al, 2002;Davis, 2010). This approach enables the statistical issues associated with the measurement and comparability of cross-country capital stocks to be avoided.…”

“…Following Pelgrin et al (2002), the user cost of capital enters as log(1+UCC). Data sources are summarised in Table A.1.…”

Does Inflation Harm Corporate Investment? Empirical Evidence from OECD Countries

“…the articles described in Section 2 and, e.g. Leahy and Whited, 1996;Guiso and Parigi, 1999;Chirinko et al, 1999;Pelgrin et al, 2002).…”

“…The literature presents specifications with very different lag structures. For example, Chirinko et al (1999) analyse a model in which investment in a given year depends on the cost of capital utilisation in as many as six previous years, while Pelgrin et al (2002) draw on an analysis of the current influence of investment determinants. The impact of _________________________ 10 For example, Voss (2002) confirmed the effect of public investment crowding out private investment in the US and Canadian economies.…”