1989
DOI: 10.1002/anr.1780320110
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased α‐Adrenergic responsiveness in idiopathic raynaud's disease

Abstract: In our study of 28 patients with idiopathic Raynaud's disease, the patients had significantly greater digital blood flow responses to intraarterial phenylephrine and clonidine than did normal control subjects. There were no group differences in finger blood flow responses to body heating, reflex cooling, digital ischemia, or to intraarterial tyramine or isoproterenol. There were also no group differences in blood pressure or heart rate during any procedure. These results suggest that patients with idiopathic R… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

4
18
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
4
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As far as the responses in the contralateral hand are concerned, our results are consistent with reports that the reflex vasoconstrictor response evoked in the finger by rapid cooling of the neck was similar in controls and in subjects with primary Raynaud's disease [10], and with evidence that the reflex increases in sympathetic outflow to the cutaneous vasculature of one hand that were evoked by cooling of the contralateral hand were similar in the two groups of Primary Raynaud's disease, cool stimuli and endothelin subjects [11]. Further, considering the cooled hand, there is no reason to argue, from the magnitude of the responses, that the direct effect of cooling on the cutaneous circulation was greater in the subjects with primary Raynaud's disease.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…As far as the responses in the contralateral hand are concerned, our results are consistent with reports that the reflex vasoconstrictor response evoked in the finger by rapid cooling of the neck was similar in controls and in subjects with primary Raynaud's disease [10], and with evidence that the reflex increases in sympathetic outflow to the cutaneous vasculature of one hand that were evoked by cooling of the contralateral hand were similar in the two groups of Primary Raynaud's disease, cool stimuli and endothelin subjects [11]. Further, considering the cooled hand, there is no reason to argue, from the magnitude of the responses, that the direct effect of cooling on the cutaneous circulation was greater in the subjects with primary Raynaud's disease.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Thus, our data indicate that the locus of racial differences in vascular reactivity involves vasoconstrictive rather than vasodilatory function. Moreover, inasmuch as cold stress induces peripheral vasoconstriction through an increase in sympathetic stimulation of ␣-adrenergic receptors 12,26 and heat stress induces peripheral vasodilation through a withdrawal of such sympathetic stimulation, 26 our findings imply a racial difference in ␣-adrenergic receptor function rather than a difference in sympathetic efferent discharge. Alternatively, these results may reflect racial differences in nonadrenergic vasoconstrictive mechanisms, involving substances such as angiotensin II or endothelin-1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…Therefore, the present study investigated possible racial differences in cardiac and vascular reactivity during wholebody exposure to a vasoconstrictive cold environment and a vasodilatory hot environment, which elicit opposite changes in sympathetic vasoconstrictor tone. 12,26 …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the study of Halperin et al [9] the majority of the subjects with primary Raynaud's disease were women while 50 % of the controls were men. In studies in which the controls and subjects with primary Raynaud's disease were well-matched, finger blood flow was not different in the two groups [20].…”
Section: Figure 5 Effects Of Warming On Cardiovascular Responses Evokmentioning
confidence: 83%