2009
DOI: 10.2985/026.015.0103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased Water Storage Capacity in Cactus Wood: A Study in the Tribe Cereeae (Cactoideae, Cactaceae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the present work, it was observed a typical situation in E. rhodotricha: which first forms non fibrous wood, when the body is young and small and does not need special investment in support, and when mature, the cambium starts forming fibrous wood since support is then needed due to the larger size (Terrazas-Salgado and Mauseth, 2002). The fibrous and non fibrous wood types observed in the present study have the same structure as described in literature, with fibrous wood composed of vessel elements in a matrix of libriform fibres, and non fibrous wood composed of vessel elements in a matrix of wide band tracheids (Gibson, 1973;Gibson and Nobel, 1986;Terrazas-Salgado and Mauseth, 2002;Mauseth, 2006;Soffiatti and Angyalossy, 2009). The only difference between the fibrous wood of the stem and root of E. rhodotricha is the presence of the storied structure in the stem, absent in the root.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the present work, it was observed a typical situation in E. rhodotricha: which first forms non fibrous wood, when the body is young and small and does not need special investment in support, and when mature, the cambium starts forming fibrous wood since support is then needed due to the larger size (Terrazas-Salgado and Mauseth, 2002). The fibrous and non fibrous wood types observed in the present study have the same structure as described in literature, with fibrous wood composed of vessel elements in a matrix of libriform fibres, and non fibrous wood composed of vessel elements in a matrix of wide band tracheids (Gibson, 1973;Gibson and Nobel, 1986;Terrazas-Salgado and Mauseth, 2002;Mauseth, 2006;Soffiatti and Angyalossy, 2009). The only difference between the fibrous wood of the stem and root of E. rhodotricha is the presence of the storied structure in the stem, absent in the root.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…The anatomical characteristics observed in the studied species are commonly observed in other Cactaceae species, as extensively described in the literature (Terrazas-Salgado and Mauseth, 2002;Soffiatti and Angyalossy, 2003, 2007, 2009Terrazas and Arias, 2003;Arruda et al, 2005;Mauseth, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…RGR can be disaggregated as the product of the net assimilation rate (NAR) (physiological component) and photosynthetic outward area ratio (POAR) (morphological component) (adapted from Poorter and Van der Werf, 1998). On the other hand, the anatomical tissues of cacti with relatively high water content (Soffiatti and Angyalossy, 2009) make cacti with a Crassulacean Acid Metabolism to be more inefficient than photosynthetic C3 ones (Lerdau et al, 1992). However, the results shown in Table 1 indicate NAR and POAR increased in BAPsprayed plants.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Cactaceae are some of the most remarkable organisms in the plant kingdom, with numerous unique features, such as a delayed formation of a periderm, the evolution of medullary bundles, and leaves modified into spines (summarized by Mauseth [2006] and Edwards and Donoghue [2006]). There are three distinct Cactaceae wood types (Mauseth and Plemons, 1995): (1) fibrous wood marked by the presence of vessels, fibers, scanty vasicentric parenchyma and sometimes bands of nonlignified parenchyma (Figure 9A); (2) wide‐banded tracheids (WBT) wood, composed of WBTs and parenchyma (Figure 9B, C); and (3) parenchymatous wood, characterized by vessels and abundant nonlignified parenchyma (Gibson, 1973; Mauseth and Plemons, 1995; Landrum, 2002; Terrazas and Arias, 2003; Mauseth, 2004; Soffiatti and Angyalossy, 2005, 2007, 2009). A complete phylogenetic reconstruction of wood evolution of Cactaceae is yet to be done; therefore, we here discuss major transitions in wood anatomy in the context of the currently available wood anatomy and phylogenetic literature (Hernández‐Hernández et al, 2011; Vázquez‐Sánchez et al, 2013; Guerrero et al, 2019; Martínez‐Quezada et al, 2020).…”
Section: Wood Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%