Olfaction, Taste, and Cognition 2002
DOI: 10.1017/cbo9780511546389.030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased Taste Sensitivity by Familiarization to Novel Stimuli: Psychophysics, fMRI, and Electrophysiological Techniques Suggest Modulations at Peripheral and Central Levels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We did not detect any interaction between gender and level of training in our olfactory data collected under different conditions. Regarding taste, increased sensitivity to tastants by repeated presentation has been demonstrated by psychophysics and fMRI in human subjects, and a peripheral implication has been confirmed by examining the electrophysiological responses of the corda tympani in an animal model (Faurion et al 2005). The participation of peripheral mechanisms in these sensitivity changes is strongly suggested by direct studies of the sensitivity of the olfactory mucosa in rodents (Wang et al 1993;Youngentob and Kent 1995).…”
Section: Inter-individual Variations Of Intrinsic Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…We did not detect any interaction between gender and level of training in our olfactory data collected under different conditions. Regarding taste, increased sensitivity to tastants by repeated presentation has been demonstrated by psychophysics and fMRI in human subjects, and a peripheral implication has been confirmed by examining the electrophysiological responses of the corda tympani in an animal model (Faurion et al 2005). The participation of peripheral mechanisms in these sensitivity changes is strongly suggested by direct studies of the sensitivity of the olfactory mucosa in rodents (Wang et al 1993;Youngentob and Kent 1995).…”
Section: Inter-individual Variations Of Intrinsic Sensitivitymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Finally, subjects classified as hypotasters were subjects who were at the statistical limit for discrimination and who were tremendously less sensitive to glutamate than tasters, even after the six 1-h repeated familiarization testing sessions ensuring sufficient repeated exposure to the stimulus (46). This study could categorize subjects into 3 classes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A previous study (Distel et al, 1999), in which Distel and colleagues performed evaluation of perceived intensity, pleasantness, and familiarity of everyday odors, demonstrated a significant positive correlation between perceived intensity and familiarity. Furthermore, another previous study (Faurion, Cerf, Pillias, & Boireau, 2002), in which Faurion and colleagues examined how participants changed sensitivity to target tastants with low familiarity changed as they grew more familiar with the tastants, demonstrated that familiarization to a target tastant decreased the iso-intensity concentration of a reference tastant and increased the perceived intensity of target tastant. Evaluation of perceived intensity does not depend only on sensory processes but is also greatly affected by cognitive process (Anderson et al, 2003;Kobayakawa, Saito, & Gotow, 2012;Small et al, 2003;Spetter, Smeets, de Graaf, & Viergever, 2010).…”
Section: Effect Of Consumption On Sensitivity To After-flavormentioning
confidence: 96%