2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.08.041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased Survival for Patients With Cirrhosis and Organ Failure in Liver Intensive Care and Validation of the Chronic Liver Failure–Sequential Organ Failure Scoring System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
91
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 92 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
5
91
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Refusal of cirrhotic patients with organ failure to the ICU may no longer be justifiable considering that the mortality of these patients when admitted to an ICU seems to be decreasing over the last decade (8). In fact, half of ACLF patients improve or the syndrome is resolved when best supportive care is given, and shortterm mortality of ACLF patients enrolled in the CANON-IC study was similar to that described for septic shock in the general population (8,9,22). However, ICU admission may not be feasible due to the high prevalence of the syndrome in a limited ICU bed availability setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Refusal of cirrhotic patients with organ failure to the ICU may no longer be justifiable considering that the mortality of these patients when admitted to an ICU seems to be decreasing over the last decade (8). In fact, half of ACLF patients improve or the syndrome is resolved when best supportive care is given, and shortterm mortality of ACLF patients enrolled in the CANON-IC study was similar to that described for septic shock in the general population (8,9,22). However, ICU admission may not be feasible due to the high prevalence of the syndrome in a limited ICU bed availability setting.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the acceptance of cirrhotic patients in ICU has been hampered by their high mortality, high costs per admission, and scarcity of ICU beds (5-7). As improved management of these patients led to improved outcomes in the intensive care setting, the refusal of admission of ACLF patients to an ICU may no longer be justifiable (6,8). Evidence on whom and when to transfer to an ICU is sparse, but recently it has been argued that ACLF should be managed in these units (9).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The MELD and Child-Pugh systems were found to underestimate the risk of mortality in ACLF, while the CLIF-C ACLF score, which measures both hepatic and extrahepatic organ dysfunction, was found to discriminate between survivors and non-survivors significantly more accurately. It could, therefore, be suggested that, while MELD and Child-Pugh scores may be useful to assess patients' eligibility for transplantation, they do not have the accuracy, precision or prognostic value to act as the only systems to evaluate the fruitlessness of continued care [29] . While there are clear determinants of poor prognosis in cirrhotic patients, including the severity of liver dysfunction and presence of organ failure, mortality rates continue to vary widely; this is probably due to the heterogeneous nature of liver ICU admission criteria across different hospitals.…”
Section: Clinical and Prognostic Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Outcomes from the intensive care unit are reasonably good (overall >50% survival to hospital discharge), particularly for acutely reversible complications, such as a GI bleed or encephalopathy. 30 It is important to regularly review progress of patients to avoid prolonged futile admissions. Escalation or palliative care plans should be clearly documented by the specialist teams to avoid difficult decisions for on-call teams.…”
Section: Nutritionmentioning
confidence: 99%