2022
DOI: 10.3390/cancers14143342
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased Soluble PD-1 Predicts Response to Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab in Melanoma

Abstract: Background: Checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized the treatment of metastatic melanoma, yielding long-term survival in a considerable proportion of the patients. Yet, 40–60% of patients do not achieve a long-term benefit from such therapy, emphasizing the urgent need to identify biomarkers that can predict response to immunotherapy and guide patients for the best possible treatment. Here, we exploited an unsupervised machine learning approach to identify potential inflammatory cytokine signatures from liqu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…19 Moreover, Himuro et al 20 Another study showed that a high increment of sPD-1 is associated with superior survival in patients with advanced melanoma treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, although baseline sPD-L1 was not associated with the prognosis. 22 It remains largely unclear why these studies yielded different results although distinct cohorts (including different tumor type, tumor burden, metastatic status, and treatment method) in each study might contribute to this discrepancy. In our study, high sPD-L1 levels before anti-PD-1 antibody treatment also showed better prognosis, although posttreatment sPD-L1 or fluctuation of sPD-L1 levels were not associated with prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…19 Moreover, Himuro et al 20 Another study showed that a high increment of sPD-1 is associated with superior survival in patients with advanced melanoma treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, although baseline sPD-L1 was not associated with the prognosis. 22 It remains largely unclear why these studies yielded different results although distinct cohorts (including different tumor type, tumor burden, metastatic status, and treatment method) in each study might contribute to this discrepancy. In our study, high sPD-L1 levels before anti-PD-1 antibody treatment also showed better prognosis, although posttreatment sPD-L1 or fluctuation of sPD-L1 levels were not associated with prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…reported that patients with melanoma who have high levels of sPD‐L1 are prone to exhibit PD during ICI treatment (ipilimumab monotherapy or combination therapy of ipilimumab plus bevacizumab [anti–vascular endothelial growth factor antibody] or sargramostim [recombinant human granulocyte‐macrophage colony stimulating factor]). Another study showed that a high increment of sPD‐1 is associated with superior survival in patients with advanced melanoma treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab, although baseline sPD‐L1 was not associated with the prognosis 22 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study reported that pretreatment sPD-1 levels were not related to either PFS or OS for advanced NSCLC patients treated with ICIs either alone or together with cytotoxic chemotherapy ( 31 ). In a study of patients with advanced melanoma, an increase in the sPD-1 concentration after the onset of treatment was a strong individual predictor of a better PFS for nivolumab plus ipilimumab, an antibody to cytotoxic T lymphocyte–associated protein–4 (CTLA-4), implicating sPD-1 in the activation of CD8 + T lymphocytes and the antitumor immune response ( 32 ). High sPD-1 levels might be a negative predictor for PD-1 blockade therapy if sPD-1 acts as a decoy for PD-1 antibodies and thereby attenuates their action in the TME.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this purpose, we analyzed the ctDNA MAF in serial samples in all patients and compared it to treatment response (Figs. [4][5][6]. In patients with response to treatment, ctDNA was not detected at any time point in 5/11 patients.…”
Section: Evaluating Circulating Tumor Dna Dynamics During Therapymentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Potential biomarkers include high PDL1 expression for anti-PD1/PDL1 therapies, and high tumor mutational burden (TMB), both now approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) as an indication for using immunotherapy unrelated to diagnosis [ 2 ]. Other biomarkers have been reported as associated with immunotherapy response, including clonal TMB [ 3 ], an inflammation gene expression signature [ 4 ], and a signature based on soluble PD-1 [ 5 ]. Additionally, somatic mutations of specific genes in the cancer cells have been found to influence the tumor microenvironment and the ability of tumor cells to evade the immune system, and hereby confer immunotherapy resistance [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%