2017
DOI: 10.1186/s12862-017-0895-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased rates of protein evolution and asymmetric deceleration after the whole-genome duplication in yeasts

Abstract: BackgroundWhole-genome duplication (WGD) events have shaped the genomes of eukaryotic organisms. Relaxed selection after duplication along with inherent functional constraints are thought to determine the fate of the paralogs and, ultimately, the evolution of gene function. Here, we investigated the rate of protein evolution (as measured by dN/dS ratios) before and after the WGD in the hemiascomycete yeasts, and the way in which changes in such rates relate to molecular and biological function.ResultsFor most … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Instead, this query was found to show only a strong reciprocal negative GI with its paralog SREBF2, highlighting the functional redundancy between the paralog pair (Figure 2e, Table S2 ) and suggesting that SREBF2 may regulate some of the transcriptional targets of SREBF1 as previously described previously (Shimano & Sato, 2017; Horton et al, 2008). Furthermore, the imbalanced number of GIs between SREBF1 and SREBF2 may point towards asymmetric paralog evolution, whereby duplicated genes gain or lose functional roles at different rates while maintaining partially redundant functions, a process previously observed in yeast and human cells (Zhou et al , 2014; VanderSluis et al , 2010; Ascencio et al , 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Instead, this query was found to show only a strong reciprocal negative GI with its paralog SREBF2, highlighting the functional redundancy between the paralog pair (Figure 2e, Table S2 ) and suggesting that SREBF2 may regulate some of the transcriptional targets of SREBF1 as previously described previously (Shimano & Sato, 2017; Horton et al, 2008). Furthermore, the imbalanced number of GIs between SREBF1 and SREBF2 may point towards asymmetric paralog evolution, whereby duplicated genes gain or lose functional roles at different rates while maintaining partially redundant functions, a process previously observed in yeast and human cells (Zhou et al , 2014; VanderSluis et al , 2010; Ascencio et al , 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…One reason is that the S. cerevisiae genome contains more ZT-than KLE-derived sequences, possibly due to biased gene conversion that replaced some KLE-derived sequences with homeologous ZT-derived ones 67, 68 . Finding that S. cerevisiae results from an allopolyploidy, rather than an autopolyploidy as originally believed, means that calculations of the relative rates of evolution of its ohnologue pairs 82 may need revision.…”
Section: Common Themes From Recent Reconstructions Of Ancient Whole-gmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asymmetries in the fates of DNA duplicates occur at multiple levels after ancient allopolyploidies: Patterns of gene loss, retention and mutation may differ markedly in the sub-genomes derived from each parent of the original hybrid 82 . A striking example is the tetraploid X. laevis in which large- and small-scale losses of DNA differ to such an extent that chromosomes derived from one parental species are markedly shorter than chromosomes from the other 60 .…”
Section: Common Themes From Recent Reconstructions Of Ancient Whole-gmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While in molecular systematics, phylogenomics is usually used to infer the evolutionary relationship of species using genome-scale sequencing data[5]. Uniting these two disparate definitions, phylogenomics is now widely regarded as the molecular phylogenetic analysis of genome-scale data sets[6], which can be used for predicting gene function[7-10], inferring evolutionary patterns of macromolecules[11-13], establishing the relationships and divergence times of genes/species[14, 15], exploring the genome duplications[16-19], and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%