2023
DOI: 10.1364/ao.479271
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased range and contrast in fog with circularly polarized imaging

Abstract: Fogs, low lying clouds, and other highly scattering environments pose a challenge for many commercial and national security sensing systems. Current autonomous systems rely on optical sensors for navigation whose performance is degraded by highly scattering environments. In our previous simulation work, we have shown that polarized light can penetrate through a scattering environment such as fog. We have demonstrated that circularly polarized light maintains its initial polar… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 44 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the performance of using circular polarized light in our field test was found to be better than using unpolarized light, but worse than linear polarization, which appears to be in contrast to studies suggesting circular polarization to be preserved better in fog. [9][10][11] The reason is that the illumination unit produces circular polarization by a combination of linear polarization filter and quarterwaveplate for 1550 nm (i.e. having a retardance ̸ = 0.25 for λ ̸ = 1550 nm), i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the performance of using circular polarized light in our field test was found to be better than using unpolarized light, but worse than linear polarization, which appears to be in contrast to studies suggesting circular polarization to be preserved better in fog. [9][10][11] The reason is that the illumination unit produces circular polarization by a combination of linear polarization filter and quarterwaveplate for 1550 nm (i.e. having a retardance ̸ = 0.25 for λ ̸ = 1550 nm), i.e.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%