2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.116956
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased power by harmonizing structural MRI site differences with the ComBat batch adjustment method in ENIGMA

Abstract: A common limitation of neuroimaging studies is their small sample sizes. To overcome this hurdle, the Enhancing Neuro Imaging Genetics through Meta-Analysis (ENIGMA) Consortium combines neuroimaging data from many institutions worldwide. However, this introduces heterogeneity due to different scanning devices and sequences. ENIGMA projects commonly address this heterogeneity with random-effects meta-analysis or mixed-effects mega-analysis. Here we tested whether the batch adjustment method, ComBat, can further… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
123
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(128 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
123
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior to conducting the mega-analysis, all neuroimaging data were adjusted for scanner protocol effects using neuroComBat 83 , a modified version of ComBat 84 that increases the statistical power and precision of neuroimaging effect size estimates 83 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to conducting the mega-analysis, all neuroimaging data were adjusted for scanner protocol effects using neuroComBat 83 , a modified version of ComBat 84 that increases the statistical power and precision of neuroimaging effect size estimates 83 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the 326 participant dataset used here came from different sites, we used ComBat (github.com/ Jfortin1/ComBatHarmonization), a batch-effect correction tool derived from studies in genomics 39 that was shown to accurately model and remove site/scanner effects. [40][41][42] ComBat assumes that imaging features can be measured linearly as a combination of the biological and scanner effects with an error term that includes a multiplicative scanner-specific scaling factor. The batch id vector corresponded to the scanning site (ie, Montreal, Sydney, Strasbourg, and the different sites included in the PPMI cohort) and the design matrix for biological effects of interest included age, sex, education, and disease status.…”
Section: Association With Longitudinal Outcomes In Irbd and With Disementioning
confidence: 99%
“…All these methods help to overcome the difficulties of MRI in interpreting the intensities between subjects, so that similar intensities will have similar tissue meaning for the standardized images. For harmonization methods working on radiomic features [23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30], a representative and widely used method is ComBat. ComBat [23] was originally proposed for the microarray expression data to remove batch effects, a type of non-biological experimental variation similar to scanner effects but observed across multiple batches in microarray experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%