2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.143602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased nitrogen use efficiency in crop production can provide economic and environmental benefits

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Phenomenal growth in the use of fertilizers for crop production, coupled with poor nitrogen-use efficiency (NUE) is increasingly polluting the soil, water and air, which adversely affects health, biodiversity, and climate change (Sutton et al, 2019 ). A recent simulation study showed that a 20% increase in the crop NUE can save $743 million per year in the USA alone (Langholtz et al, 2021 ). Therefore, improving the crop NUE remains a highly desirable economic and environmental goal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Phenomenal growth in the use of fertilizers for crop production, coupled with poor nitrogen-use efficiency (NUE) is increasingly polluting the soil, water and air, which adversely affects health, biodiversity, and climate change (Sutton et al, 2019 ). A recent simulation study showed that a 20% increase in the crop NUE can save $743 million per year in the USA alone (Langholtz et al, 2021 ). Therefore, improving the crop NUE remains a highly desirable economic and environmental goal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To enhance nitrogen-use efficiency (NUE) and minimizing N losses effectively, several strategies have been employed in recent years [21]. Use of urease and nitrification inhibitors is an effective technique in minimizing the N losses [22], but urease and nitrification inhibitors are too expensive for common farmer [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results confirm the potential importance of controlling agricultural emissions for improving air quality in terms of PM 2.5 , which could be practical as there are numerous feasible options for reducing agricultural emissions through optimizing livestock and crop production systems (e.g., Ti et al, 2019). Incentivizing these and other practices that improve agricultural nitrogen use efficiency (e.g., including livestock production with cropping, synchronizing nitrogen supply with crop demand) (e.g., Fageria and Baligar, 2005;Langholtz et al, 2021) can be one of the keys to mitigate the air quality impacts of reactive nitrogen input without compromising agricultural productivity (e.g., Guo et al, 2020). Furthermore, as increasing reactive nitrogen input and land use change are the two of the main strategies to meet the global demand for biomassbased products in the future (Foley et al, 2011), the distinct yet significant impacts of agricultural emissions and land use change on O 3 , PM 2.5 and nitrogen deposition should be investigated as part of the overall environmental impacts of land system changes, especially when there is a trade-off between increasing land input and cropland expansion (e.g., Lotze-Campen et al, 2010;Mauser et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%