2023
DOI: 10.1071/an22390
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased light scattering in electrically stimulated beef longissimus muscle fibres contributes to the observed meat colour at grading

Abstract: Context. Electrical stimulation is often used by meat processors to promote fast muscle pH decline and optimise meat quality. Meat colour can be made more acceptable by this process, but how this relates to the microstructure and light-scattering properties of muscle is still unknown. Aims. To investigate the effect of electrical stimulation of beef carcasses on the meat colour at grading and the role of the muscle fibre microstructure and light scattering in determining colour differences. Methods. Electrical… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, the b * value is affected only by the freezing temperature and their interaction. In this instance, the L * value’s level directly represents how strongly light is reflected from the muscle surface Table demonstrates that L * values for L-38 and C-38 treated pork were significantly higher than those for L-18 and C-18 treatments ( P = 0.0001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In contrast, the b * value is affected only by the freezing temperature and their interaction. In this instance, the L * value’s level directly represents how strongly light is reflected from the muscle surface Table demonstrates that L * values for L-38 and C-38 treated pork were significantly higher than those for L-18 and C-18 treatments ( P = 0.0001).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In this instance, the L* value's level directly represents how strongly light is reflected from the muscle surface. 22 Table 1 demonstrates that L* values for L-38 and C-38 treated pork were significantly higher than those for L-18 and C-18 treatments (P = 0.0001). In contrast, L* values for L-18 treated pork were significantly higher than those for C-18 treatment in the third and fourth months of frozen storage (P < 0.05).…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%