2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.01.13.21249721
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased infections, but not viral burden, with a new SARS-CoV-2 variant

Abstract: BackgroundA new variant of SARS-CoV-2, B.1.1.7/VOC202012/01, was identified in the UK in December-2020. Direct estimates of its potential to enhance transmission are limited.MethodsNose and throat swabs from 28-September-2020 to 2-January-2021 in the UK’s nationally representative surveillance study were tested by RT-PCR for three genes (N, S and ORF1ab). Those positive only on ORF1ab+N, S-gene target failures (SGTF), are compatible with B.1.1.7/VOC202012/01. We investigated cycle threshold (Ct) values (a prox… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
55
0
3

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
55
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In total, we had 16,297 positive tests and we traced the average Ct values stratified to two age groups: individuals over 60 (5,317 positive tests) and individuals between 40 to 60 years old (10,980 positive tests). Consistent with previous studies ( 6 ), we did not observe substantially higher viral load due to the emergence of B.1.1.7 in Israel.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In total, we had 16,297 positive tests and we traced the average Ct values stratified to two age groups: individuals over 60 (5,317 positive tests) and individuals between 40 to 60 years old (10,980 positive tests). Consistent with previous studies ( 6 ), we did not observe substantially higher viral load due to the emergence of B.1.1.7 in Israel.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Third, we assumed that the emerging variants distribute equally among age groups. We believe that this assumption is a valid approximation since by mid January 50% of the thousands of daily cases had this strain, meaning that these variants were widely distributed in Israel by late January and that previous studies did not find differences in viral load between B.1.1.7 and wild type SARS-CoV-2 ( 6 ). Fourth, it has been estimated that 33% of all cases in Israel are due to household transmission.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…In infected individuals, a small but significant decrease in Ct values in G614 compared to D614 infections in the UK demonstrated increased viral load for variants carrying D614G (Volz, Hill, et al, 2021). For B.1.1.7, early analysis using the number of mapped sequencing reads or Ct values as proxies for viral load suggested an increased viral burden associated with B.1.1.7 infection (Golubchik et al, 2021;Kidd et al, 2020) but more recent reports show no such association at either the population level or longitudinally in individuals (Kissler et al, 2021;Walker et al, 2021). The more recent reports and our data suggest there is no clear replicative advantage for B.1.1.7 in vitro or at the population level.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The copyright holder for this this version posted February 24, 2021. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.02.24.432576 doi: bioRxiv preprint Walker et al, 2021). Another recent study showed similar peak viral burden but an increased duration of infection with B.1.1.7 infection, albeit with a small sample size (Kissler et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimates suggest increased transmissibility and disease severity. [17][18][19][20] The lineage carries several mutations of immunologic significance, including N501Y located in the receptor-binding domain (RBD), a key neutralising antibody target; deletions in the N-terminal domain at residues 69/70, associated with viral escape in the immunocompromised and S-gene target failure (SGTF) in PCR assays; and a deletion at residue 144 resulting in decreased monoclonal antibody binding. 21 Reinfection rates following natural infection have not been shown to be higher in studies using SGTF as a proxy for B.1.1.7, 20,22 even though variably decreased sensitivity to neutralisation by monoclonal antibodies, convalescent plasma and sera from vaccinated individuals has been observed in vitro for B.1.1.7.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%