2018
DOI: 10.1017/s0033291718000387
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased hippocampal engagement during learning as a marker of sensitivity to psychotomimetic effects of δ-9-THC

Abstract: These results suggest that altered hippocampal activation during verbal encoding may serve as a marker of sensitivity to the acute psychotomimetic effects of THC.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Data was normally distributed. Paired t -tests were used to estimate the effects of Δ9-THC on symptoms (focusing on peak changes from the baseline, as we did not expect symptom manifestation by the 2.5-hour time point ( 14 )) and striatal Glx values, and t -tests to compare Δ9-THC-induced Glx changes between subjects sensitive to and those not sensitive to the psychotomimetic effects of Δ9-THC, based on the manifestation of clearly detectable primary symptoms of psychosis (≥ 2-point increase in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) ( 40 ) delusions, hallucinations, unusual thought content, suspiciousness, and grandiosity items), as drawn from previous factor analytic work ( 49 ) as well as previous work to characterize acute sensitivity to Δ9-THC ( 50 ). Pearson correlation analyses were used to test for an association between changes in striatal Glx values and previous cannabis exposure (SPSS version 22; SPSS Inc, Chicago, Illinois).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data was normally distributed. Paired t -tests were used to estimate the effects of Δ9-THC on symptoms (focusing on peak changes from the baseline, as we did not expect symptom manifestation by the 2.5-hour time point ( 14 )) and striatal Glx values, and t -tests to compare Δ9-THC-induced Glx changes between subjects sensitive to and those not sensitive to the psychotomimetic effects of Δ9-THC, based on the manifestation of clearly detectable primary symptoms of psychosis (≥ 2-point increase in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) ( 40 ) delusions, hallucinations, unusual thought content, suspiciousness, and grandiosity items), as drawn from previous factor analytic work ( 49 ) as well as previous work to characterize acute sensitivity to Δ9-THC ( 50 ). Pearson correlation analyses were used to test for an association between changes in striatal Glx values and previous cannabis exposure (SPSS version 22; SPSS Inc, Chicago, Illinois).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whilst no behavioural differences in recall tasks were observed during a verbal paired associative learning task, oral 10mg THC (vs. placebo) abolished the normal decrement in parahippocampal activation during encoding and attenuated ventrostriatal activation during word retrieval ( Bhattacharyya et al, 2009 ). Under placebo conditions participants sensitive to the psychotogenic effects of cannabis had higher hippocampal activation during verbal encoding compared to participants without a psychotogenic response ( Bhattacharyya et al, 2018 ). In keeping with these findings, while THC (6 mg inhaled) reduced activity during encoding in the right insula, the right inferior frontal gyrus, and the left middle occipital gyrus during performance of a pictorial associative memory task, activity during recall was significantly increased in a network of recall-related brain regions, with most prominent effects in the cuneus and precuneus.…”
Section: The Acute Effects Of Cannabis and Thcmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard, controlled experiments administering 9-THC and other cannabinoids to healthy people are particularly valuable. When implemented in an MRI design, such challenge studies may elucidate how different cannabinoids modulate human behavior by tracking the acute modulation of related neurobiological processes and their genetic, neurophysiological, and neuroreceptor determinants (Bhattacharyya et al, 2012a(Bhattacharyya et al, ,b, 2014(Bhattacharyya et al, , 2017(Bhattacharyya et al, , 2018a.…”
Section: Cannabis Psychosis and Cognitive Dysfunctionmentioning
confidence: 99%