2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2015.01.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased hip abduction in high body mass index subjects during sit-to-stand

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
6
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Huffman et al showed an increase in obese hip adduction moment normalized to a subject height and weight. 28 Although our study did not normalize the hip adductor moments, a similar result was seen. Normally, obese participants have a greater ground reaction force compared with TD participants, especially at slow walking speeds.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Huffman et al showed an increase in obese hip adduction moment normalized to a subject height and weight. 28 Although our study did not normalize the hip adductor moments, a similar result was seen. Normally, obese participants have a greater ground reaction force compared with TD participants, especially at slow walking speeds.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…14 McMillan et al and Huffman et al had higher values of hip adduction than the current study (16.4°and 14.3°, respectively), but also followed the trend of increased hip adduction in obese participants. 19,28 Finally, Shultz et al showed obese subjects had increased hip adduction, but their results were not statistically significant. 18 Overall, hip adduction findings are consistent across studies, supporting the validity of our gait results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The findings of the present study should be taken with caution because the STS task has many variable factors that may influence the results, such as the chair seat height, the use of armrests [ 32 ] and variations in age [ 49 ] and BMI [ 50 ] of the subjects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model regarded the cervical spine as one rigid segment and the lumbar spine as another rigid segment, where C7-T1 junction was defined as CT joint and L5-S1 as LS joint. AP reaction force was normalized by body mass considering that reaction force has a proportional relationship with body mass [ 29 , 30 ]. Joint moment was also normalized by body mass times height (Nm/(kg*m)) [ 23 , 29 , 31 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%