2017
DOI: 10.1161/jaha.117.005946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased Hazard of Myocardial Infarction With Insulin‐Provision Therapy in Actively Smoking Patients With Diabetes Mellitus and Stable Ischemic Heart Disease: The BARI 2D (Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes) Trial

Abstract: BackgroundIn the BARI 2D (Bypass Angioplasty Revascularization Investigation 2 Diabetes) trial, randomization of diabetic patients with stable ischemic heart disease to insulin provision (IP) therapy, as opposed to insulin sensitization (IS) therapy, resulted in biochemical evidence of impaired fibrinolysis but no increase in adverse clinical outcomes. We hypothesized that the prothrombotic effect of IP therapy in combination with the hypercoagulable state induced by active smoking would result in an increased… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar findings were demonstrated in the higher mortality risk amongst first-presentation ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients free of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors than their counterparts with preexisting risk factors, where the risks were attenuated after adjusting for the application of guideline-directed therapy [32]. Current studies that demonstrate higher cardiovascular adverse events and mortality risk amongst insulin users randomized patients with diabetes mellitus into insulin provision and insulin sensitization groups, which did not reflect the more advanced disease state amongst typical insulin users in real life [33,34]. However, given sulphonylurea is a second-line agent, the earlier development of CHD marks for early macrovascular involvement, therefore reflecting a poorer disease prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Similar findings were demonstrated in the higher mortality risk amongst first-presentation ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients free of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors than their counterparts with preexisting risk factors, where the risks were attenuated after adjusting for the application of guideline-directed therapy [32]. Current studies that demonstrate higher cardiovascular adverse events and mortality risk amongst insulin users randomized patients with diabetes mellitus into insulin provision and insulin sensitization groups, which did not reflect the more advanced disease state amongst typical insulin users in real life [33,34]. However, given sulphonylurea is a second-line agent, the earlier development of CHD marks for early macrovascular involvement, therefore reflecting a poorer disease prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…23 Current studies that demonstrate a higher cardiovascular adverse event and mortality risk amongst insulin users randomized patients with diabetes mellitus into insulin provision and insulin sensitization groups, which did not reflect the more advanced disease state amongst typical insulin users in real life. 24,25 However, given sulphonylurea is a second-line agent, the earlier development of CHD marks for early macrovascular involvement, therefore reflecting a poorer disease prognosis. In addition, the cardioprotective effect of sulphonylurea is relatively weak compared to other antidiabetic agents, hence further increasing the mortality risk.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coagulation factors, which were not examined in this study, may also be a mechanism. Hyperinsulinemia promotes a procoagulant state 47 , increasing in several coagulation factors, such as thrombin generation 47 , and plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 48 , which have been identified as potential causes of IHD and MI 49,50 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insulin causing MI may also partly explain the unexpected off-target effects of insulin raising treatments, such as sulfonylureas 19 . Similarly, insulin therapy has a relatively higher risk of MI than insulin sensitization therapy 48 . Several medications for type 2 diabetes, such as metformin, thiazolidinediones, sodium-glucose transport inhibitors, and glucagon-like peptide 1 agonists may reduce the need for insulin 52 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%