1982
DOI: 10.1007/bf00498939
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased cotransformation of distant markers and altered patterns of DNA-cell interactions following the exposure of transforming DNA to two carcinogenic and mutagenic alkylating agents, diethyl and dimethyl sulfate

Abstract: Transforming DNA exposed to either diethyl sulfate (diES) or dimethyl sulfate (diMS) is inactivated. The rate of inactivation depends on the marker tested and on the chemical used: diMS is more active than diES. Cotransformation of linked markers is similarly depressed. In contrast, there is a transient increase in the cotransformation of distant, unlinked markers. These observations indicate that some of the intermolecular complexes of transforming DNA created in the test tube by the treatment with diES and d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1986
1986
1986
1986

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The techniques used were published earlier 1982). Bacillus subtilis auxotroph strain SB238, which requires tryptophan, tyrosine, and leucine for 392/KUBINSKI AND KUBINSKI growth, was exposed to DNA obtained from a prototrophic strain 764.…”
Section: Bacterial Transformation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The techniques used were published earlier 1982). Bacillus subtilis auxotroph strain SB238, which requires tryptophan, tyrosine, and leucine for 392/KUBINSKI AND KUBINSKI growth, was exposed to DNA obtained from a prototrophic strain 764.…”
Section: Bacterial Transformation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DNA was extracted from donor prototrophic bacteria as described elsewhere (Kubinski, et al, 1966;Kubinski and Kubinski, 1982) and used for transformation either untreated or after being treated with one of the carcinogenic chemicals. In most experiments summarized in the RESULTS section, the chemical was subsequently removed by either dialysis, alcohol precipitation, filtration through gels (Sephadex G25) or sucrose density gradient centrifugation.…”
Section: Bacterial Transformation Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%