2015
DOI: 10.1002/ajh.24061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased bone marrow FDG uptake at PET/CT is not a sufficient proof of bone marrow involvement in diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
2
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though in our previous work, and in line with others [12,17], we suggested that a positive PET/CT could abrogate the need for a BMB, according to our present results, we now believe that BMB should be performed in all DLBCL patients at baseline. In the absence of a feasible gold standard for a methodologically indisputable assessment of the sensibility and specificity of both techniques, we now agree with Adams, et al when stating that the lack of prognostic implications of bone marrow involvement detected by FDG-PET/CT strongly suggests there is a considerable proportion of false-positive FDG-PET/CT cases in patients with DLBCL [23]. In addition, Negative 197 11 208 151 10 161 Positive 36 24 60 26 16 42 Total 233 35 268 177 26 203 BMB, bone marrow biopsy; PET/CT, possitron emission tomography/computer tomography.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Though in our previous work, and in line with others [12,17], we suggested that a positive PET/CT could abrogate the need for a BMB, according to our present results, we now believe that BMB should be performed in all DLBCL patients at baseline. In the absence of a feasible gold standard for a methodologically indisputable assessment of the sensibility and specificity of both techniques, we now agree with Adams, et al when stating that the lack of prognostic implications of bone marrow involvement detected by FDG-PET/CT strongly suggests there is a considerable proportion of false-positive FDG-PET/CT cases in patients with DLBCL [23]. In addition, Negative 197 11 208 151 10 161 Positive 36 24 60 26 16 42 Total 233 35 268 177 26 203 BMB, bone marrow biopsy; PET/CT, possitron emission tomography/computer tomography.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…In the absence of a feasible gold standard for a methodologically indisputable assessment of the sensibility and specificity of both techniques, we now agree with Adams, et al. when stating that the lack of prognostic implications of bone marrow involvement detected by FDG‐PET/CT strongly suggests there is a considerable proportion of false‐positive FDG‐PET/CT cases in patients with DLBCL . In addition, it could seem contradictory that BM involvement based on BMB had prognostic impact on PFS but not on OS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 74%
“…A meta-analysis performed on 654 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma showed that 3% of patients with proven bone marrow involvement on biopsy had a negative PET scan. 9 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 9 As we have previously debated, diagnostic performance studies (including ours) comparing BMB vs PET‐CT in this setting inevitably suffer a bias derived from the lack of an independent gold‐standard. 41 , 42 Thus, the prognostic value of each technique emerges as a better surrogate marker for clinical utility.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%