2010
DOI: 10.5194/bgd-7-787-2010
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Increased bacterial growth efficiency with environmental variability: results from DOC degradation by bacteria in pure culture experiments

Abstract: Abstract. This paper assesses how considering variation in DOC availability and cell maintenance in bacterial models affects Bacterial Growth Efficiency (BGE) estimations. For this purpose, we conducted two biodegradation experiments simultaneously. In experiment one, a given amount of substrate was added to the culture at the start of the experiment whilst in experiment two, the same amount of substrate was added, but using periodic pulses over the time course of the experiment. Three bacterial models, with d… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Bacterial carbon demand (BCD) was calculated from the BP with a unique bacterial growth efficiency (BGE) of 15%, as reported for the Sargasso Sea [ Carlson and Ducklow , 1996] and for the west Med [ Sempéré et al , 2003]. This value can be criticized because bacteria, which originate from different stations and depths, very likely grow with different BGE [ Eichinger et al , 2006, 2010, 2011]. The 15% value was used to obtain a rough estimate of the average amount of DOC needed by bacteria to sustain the observed BP.…”
Section: Carbon Fluxes Through the Microbial Loopmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bacterial carbon demand (BCD) was calculated from the BP with a unique bacterial growth efficiency (BGE) of 15%, as reported for the Sargasso Sea [ Carlson and Ducklow , 1996] and for the west Med [ Sempéré et al , 2003]. This value can be criticized because bacteria, which originate from different stations and depths, very likely grow with different BGE [ Eichinger et al , 2006, 2010, 2011]. The 15% value was used to obtain a rough estimate of the average amount of DOC needed by bacteria to sustain the observed BP.…”
Section: Carbon Fluxes Through the Microbial Loopmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, it would allow for a consistent chemical signature from the community on the DOC samples and ideally a common exometabolome (Wienhausen et al ). Past studies have successfully used single bacterial isolates to answer research questions about the drivers of DOC biodegradation, such as the effects of labile C additions (Bianchi et al ) or environmental variability (Eichinger et al ). Indeed, single or reduced groups of bacterial strains seem able to consume most of the labile DOC pool in aquatic ecosystems (Nelson and Wear ; Pedler et al ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where predation-prey interactions dominate the literature on population dynamics, our results point to the importance of syntrophic interaction as one of the mechanisms for maintenance of biodiversity (Muller et al, 2009;Eynaud et al, 2011). Nutritional details and the dynamics of biodegradation can have large effects on system properties (Eichinger et al, 2009(Eichinger et al, , 2010Poggiale et al, 2010), a worrying observation.…”
Section: Population and Ecosystem Levelsmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…A strong effect of a chemical compound is less of a problem if combined with a very short residence time in the environment; the degradability of compounds (e.g. Lika and Papadakis, 2009;Eichinger et al, 2010) is of more environmental relevance then its effects, but the combination is what matters. Extrapolation from effects of one compound to that of the other, form effects on one species to other species of organism, from effects on individuals to that on populations and ecosystems will need to be integrated with effect-fate studies.…”
Section: Further Developmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%