2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01626.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incorporation of Spatial and Economic Analyses of Human-Use Data in the Design of Marine Protected Areas

Abstract: Social, economic, and ecological criteria contribute to the successful design, implementation, and management of marine protected areas (MPAs). In the context of California's Marine Life Protection Act Initiative, we developed a set of methods for collecting, compiling, and analyzing data about the spatial extent and relative economic importance of commercial and recreational fishing. We interviewed 174 commercial fishers who represented the major fisheries in the initiative's north-central coast region, which… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our scenarios reflected two approaches that met different management objectives: seabird conservation alone (scenario 1), and seabird conservation while considering the impact of human activities (scenario 2). The latter approach has been applied in state waters adjacent to the Sanctuaries and encompasses the principles of marine spatial planning [36], [77]. Incorporating human uses shifted cell selection towards the offshore region west of the 200-m isobath.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our scenarios reflected two approaches that met different management objectives: seabird conservation alone (scenario 1), and seabird conservation while considering the impact of human activities (scenario 2). The latter approach has been applied in state waters adjacent to the Sanctuaries and encompasses the principles of marine spatial planning [36], [77]. Incorporating human uses shifted cell selection towards the offshore region west of the 200-m isobath.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its implications for biodiversity conservation are evident Eddy et al, 2010;Carter and Nielsen, 2011;Scholz et al, 2011;Zukowski et al, 2011;Brewer, 2013], as it serves as one of the greatest obstacles to wildlife survival which, for example, lies in the relationship between ecosystems and human cultures [Davis-Case, 2001]. For non-human primates, LEK is studied within the discipline of ethnoprimatology, which focuses on ecological and social interconnections between human populations and non-human primates [Sponsel, 1997;Riley, 2006;Hill and Webber, 2010].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the opportunity cost of a permanent closure zone that prohibits all fishing activities will be higher than in a partial protection zone that allows some kinds of fishing. Data on the opportunity cost of different zones are rarely available for marine planning (but see Klein et al [10]), and can be costly to collect, especially over large planning regions [28]. To compensate, planners often develop surrogates to represent the opportunity cost of implementing a no-take area based on population [29], area [30], threats [31], and etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%