2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.109986
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incorporation of latitude-adjusted bioclimatic variables increases accuracy in species distribution models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the magnitude of plasticity in thermal tolerance in response to environmental signals is expected to be different between species, depending on their thermal sensitivity. Considering that B. sachalinensis is an ecological generalist and has a broad distribution range [ 31 ], especially when compared to R. uenoi [ 28 ], the environmental variability within the five-degree latitudinal gradient studied is not sufficiently large to show plasticity in CTmax, and therefore may preclude the species from adapting to climate change, despite demonstrated variations in responses to environmental variables within the range of the species [ 39 ]. Alternatively, it is possible that B. sachalinensis does not need to show plasticity in CTmax due to their generalist lifestyle or because of other mechanisms of regulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the magnitude of plasticity in thermal tolerance in response to environmental signals is expected to be different between species, depending on their thermal sensitivity. Considering that B. sachalinensis is an ecological generalist and has a broad distribution range [ 31 ], especially when compared to R. uenoi [ 28 ], the environmental variability within the five-degree latitudinal gradient studied is not sufficiently large to show plasticity in CTmax, and therefore may preclude the species from adapting to climate change, despite demonstrated variations in responses to environmental variables within the range of the species [ 39 ]. Alternatively, it is possible that B. sachalinensis does not need to show plasticity in CTmax due to their generalist lifestyle or because of other mechanisms of regulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, sampling in the Republic of Korea along the same general latitudinal and climatic variation was able to demonstrate the Rapoport’s rule in ants [ 37 ], and passerine bird species richness was influenced by the latitudinal gradient [ 38 ]. Finally, the ecology of one of the focal species is known to be latitudinally dependent, as shown through ecological models [ 39 ]. At each site, three ponds were selected and eight tadpoles at Gosner development stages between 26 and 29 [ 40 ] were collected from each of the three ponds to avoid sampling tadpoles from the same clutch.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While we acknowledge the presence of latitudinal variations in breeding phenology and ecological requirements of species within the Korean peninsula (Andersen et al, 2022), we did not consider the variation large enough to impact the results of this study. In addition, we do not expect a significant gradient due to the small size of the country and creating bins would result in too small of a dataset to be meaningful for some species at some of the elevation bins.…”
Section: Data Encodingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, considering topographic variables are the most important factors for P. euphratica [40] and are positively correlated with SDMs [41], elevation, the distance from the river reservoir were also selected as an input variable. Since the inclusion of latitude and longitude-adjusted environmental variables more accurate modeling of species distribution and suitability are available [42], latitude and longitude were also considered here. Therefore, 12 months of groundwater, elevation, distance from the river, and latitude and longitude were considered as inputs to the model in this study (table 1).…”
Section: Variables Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%