1992
DOI: 10.1016/0040-6090(92)90397-t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incorporation of cytochrome b5 into supported phospholipid bilayers by vesicle fusion to supported monolayers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The question we address here is whether there is a sidedness to the deposition process. Kalb and co-workers Kalb and Tamm, 1992) have used vesicle fusion to supported monolayers to produce supported bilayers. They have proposed a mechanism that results in both the inner and outer leaflets of the vesicle forming the second monolayer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The question we address here is whether there is a sidedness to the deposition process. Kalb and co-workers Kalb and Tamm, 1992) have used vesicle fusion to supported monolayers to produce supported bilayers. They have proposed a mechanism that results in both the inner and outer leaflets of the vesicle forming the second monolayer.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For integral membrane proteins, methods to incorporate the proteins into the supported planar membrane required vesicle fusion: either directly fusing vesicles that contained integral membrane proteins onto a supported substrate, such a piece of quartz or glass coverslip [45] or fusing them onto a substrate which was previously coated with a monolayer of lipids [68,69]. The mechanism of such events was not understood.…”
Section: Lipids At Interfaces: An Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using FRAP, it was shown that the mobile fraction of the cytochrome b 5 containing SLBs is as low as 35%. This was attributed to the interaction of the protein with the underlying substrate and a possible dependence of the mobility on the orientation of the C‐terminus in the SLB . Subsequent studies utilized different substrates such as silver or gold,[29a], or biotinylated lipids in SLBs to which biotinylated cytochrome c was bound via a streptavidin linker .…”
Section: Incorporation Of Proteins Into Slbs For Light Harvesting Andmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This was attributed to the interaction of the protein with the underlying substrate and a possible dependence of the mobility on the orientation of the C-terminus in the SLB. [ 114 ] Subsequent studies utilized different substrates such as silver or gold, [ 29a , 115 ] or biotinylated lipids in SLBs to which biotinylated cytochrome c was bound via a streptavidin linker. [ 116 ] These approaches allowed improved control over the orientation of cytochrome in SLBs.…”
Section: Cytochromesmentioning
confidence: 99%