2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11266-018-9971-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incorporation and Individualization of Collective Voices: Public Service User Involvement and the User Movement’s Mobilization for Change

Abstract: 'Service user involvement' is a widespread and well-known phenomenon within welfare policy and practice in Western countries and is usually perceived as a way of improving welfare services to better aid service users in managing their predicaments. However, the presented ethnographical study of service user involvement within a Swedish psychiatry organization shows that user involvement initiatives might also result in unintended and undesired effects on the collective user movement (i.e. the service user orga… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
7

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
9
0
7
Order By: Relevance
“…It could further risk diluting the critical edge of the service user movement, through limiting the ability to function as a protest movement and constitute a counterpart to government authorities (cf. Näslund, Markström, and Sjöström 2017;Eriksson 2018;Böhm, Dinerstein, and Spicer 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It could further risk diluting the critical edge of the service user movement, through limiting the ability to function as a protest movement and constitute a counterpart to government authorities (cf. Näslund, Markström, and Sjöström 2017;Eriksson 2018;Böhm, Dinerstein, and Spicer 2010).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…User involvement was conceptualized in terms of "joint efforts", "collaboration", and "mutual understanding"; creating a sense of a common "we". This consensus rhetoric reinforced the ideational and emotional bonding, and encouraged user representatives to accept or adopt the standpoints of the welfare organizations (see further on these processes in Eriksson, 2018). For many (but not all) user representatives, the more time they spent with(in) the welfare organizations (i.e.…”
Section: Bondingmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, the so-called 'crisis of representation' triggered a debate on who has the right to speak for marginalised groups, and was followed by a pluralisation of knowledge claims, where speaking from experience gained new status (Voronka 2016). Experiential knowledge can, however, be formulated in different ways and some have described how service user influence is increasingly focused on sharing individual experience (Eriksson 2018). This is reflected in the way service providers today, through employment relationships, can bring in experiential perspectives directly from selected individuals, unaffiliated with service user movements (Alm Andreassen 2018).…”
Section: Enhanced Status Of Experiential Knowledgementioning
confidence: 99%