2013
DOI: 10.1111/j.1548-1433.2012.01533.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incorporation and Colonization: Postcolumbian Iroquois Satellite Communities and Processes of Indigenous Autonomy

Abstract: Recent anthropological work demonstrates rising concern for understanding group-level autonomy, particularly the maintenance of opposition to expanding states and economic systems. Archaeologists are well poised to contribute to this effort, especially when aided by renewed attention to Eric Wolf's concept of process.Wolf's concept can be applied to indigenous-driven, broad-scale processes of intercommunity connection to help

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of importance, this view of consumption also intersects theoretical debate regarding the entangled nature of continuity and change in colonial settings by demonstrating how many of the apparent changes of the colonial period were internally structured, rather than externally imposed (Ferris 2009;Jordan 2013;Panich 2013;Silliman 2009). There is no doubt that native people actively incorporated new materials into their practices, but the context of use often points toward long-term processes in which existing traditions were reinterpreted to fit new, colonial circum-stances (Rubertone 2000).…”
Section: Consumption Colonialism and The California Missionsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Of importance, this view of consumption also intersects theoretical debate regarding the entangled nature of continuity and change in colonial settings by demonstrating how many of the apparent changes of the colonial period were internally structured, rather than externally imposed (Ferris 2009;Jordan 2013;Panich 2013;Silliman 2009). There is no doubt that native people actively incorporated new materials into their practices, but the context of use often points toward long-term processes in which existing traditions were reinterpreted to fit new, colonial circum-stances (Rubertone 2000).…”
Section: Consumption Colonialism and The California Missionsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…15, pp. 15–22; ( 13 , 23 , 43 – 45 )]. In addition, the revised chronology has relevance for how developments in Iroquoia may be associated with climate: the transformative coalescent and postcoalescent Phases [( 3 , 14 ); see the Supplementary Materials] now occur across the peak of the Little Ice Age (LIA) from the mid-1500s to the early 1600s and not across the previous century or so.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Archaeologists are thus poised to move beyond decades-old questions about continuity and change to consider indigenous agency and autonomy in the colonial period. As used here, autonomy refers to freedom of action within situational constraints (Jordan, 2013;Schwartz and Green, 2013). When applied to the archaeology of colonialism, an examination of autonomy de-centers static, trait-based approaches to native cultures and the concomitant scholarly focus on externally-imposed change.…”
Section: Colonialism Landscapes and Autonomymentioning
confidence: 98%