2015
DOI: 10.2514/1.g000890
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incorporating Uncertainty in Admissible Regions for Uncorrelated Detections

Abstract: Admissible region methods for initial orbit determination are generally implemented without considering uncertainty in observations or observer state. In this paper a generalization of the admissible region approach is introduced that more accurately accounts for uncertainty in the constraint hypothesis parameters used to generate the admissible region. Considering the uncertainty to have Gaussian distributions, the proposed relationship between provided information uncertainty and admissible region uncertaint… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is assumed that no information can be reliably used to determine these states from measurements. The following notation was developed by Worthy et al [32]. Using equations (9) and (11) and the fact that the measurement cannot be dependent on xu, the following measurement function can be written.…”
Section: Appendix: VImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is assumed that no information can be reliably used to determine these states from measurements. The following notation was developed by Worthy et al [32]. Using equations (9) and (11) and the fact that the measurement cannot be dependent on xu, the following measurement function can be written.…”
Section: Appendix: VImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Double-R iteration and Gooding's method allow for longer time periods between observations, but require a guess to initialize the iteration. These classical angles-only IOD algorithms are sensitive to noise and to certain observertarget geometryas shown in both our own previous work [3][4][5] and also various other IOD studies [6][7][8][9][10][11]. All angles-only IOD algorithms mentioned utilize the observer-target geometry and assumptions defined from the Kepler problem to define a point solution, thus lacking any uncertainty information.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last years a probabilistic approach is becoming more popular: here the AR is described as a bivariate uniform probability density function (PDF), where, thus, each point of the constrained plane has the same probability to represent the real observation. Although more complete because it easily allows for the inclusion of uncertainties in observations, measurements and timing-as described by Worthy III and Holzinger (2015a)-this approach also poses some new difficulties. Indeed, Worthy III and Holzinger (2015b) describe the constraints for the variables transformations and conclude that in general it is very difficult to transform a PDF if the transformation function is not linear or the PDF is not Gaussian (Park and Scheeres 2006), and both assumptions usually do not hold for the IOD case.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%