2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2011.01443.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incorporating teledermatology into emergency medicine

Abstract: The present study has shown that SETS can provide rapid and accurate diagnostic and treatment advice from a specialist for dermatological presentations to the ED.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
54
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This has been previously studied in Queensland, where a store-and-forward photography system accompanied by relevant history and examination findings was a rapid and accurate diagnostic tool for dermatological presentations to ED [13]. Whilst this study used photos taken with a camera, a Swedish study used multimedia messaging systems (MMS) from mobile phone cameras as an easier way of transmitting information from the bedside, which would be more practical in the ED setting [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This has been previously studied in Queensland, where a store-and-forward photography system accompanied by relevant history and examination findings was a rapid and accurate diagnostic tool for dermatological presentations to ED [13]. Whilst this study used photos taken with a camera, a Swedish study used multimedia messaging systems (MMS) from mobile phone cameras as an easier way of transmitting information from the bedside, which would be more practical in the ED setting [14].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most of the studies 51% (33) were on SAFT for general teledermatology (Seventeen studies [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] on SAFT with the gold standard comparison (Grade 1-2) were included, 10 studies [36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] without a gold standard comparison (Grade 3-5) were excluded. Furthermore, there were 6 studies on SAFT [13][14][15][16][17][18] that were excluded as these studies had a gold standard comparison with face-to-face examination; however, the comparison was carried out by a nurse or general practitioners and not a dermatologist.…”
Section: Methods Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average DA obtained from 17 studies [19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35] with gold standard comparison on SAFT were 73. 35 ± 14.87 and the average value for VC with 8 studies [46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53] with the gold standard comparison were 70.37 ± 7.01 [ Table 3].…”
Section: Comparison Of Da Of Saft Vc Versus 100% Accuracy As Standarmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Compared to the gold standard of an in-person follow-up visit within 2 weeks, there was diagnostic agreement in 98 % of cases and management agreement in 96 % of cases. The system provided a median response time of 27 min, with 62 % of consults answered within 30 min and 94 % within 2 h [32]. Biscak and colleagues conducted a descriptive follow-up study of 167 consultations submitted using the Skin Emergency Telemedicine Service, including a survey distributed to referring clinicians.…”
Section: Inpatient Consultationsmentioning
confidence: 99%