Incorporating subjective and stochastic uncertainty in an interactive multi-objective groundwater calibration framework

Abstract

The interactive multi-objective genetic algorithm (IMOGA) combines traditional optimization with an interactive framework that considers the subjective knowledge of hydro-geological experts in addition to quantitative calibration measures such as calibration errors and regularization to solve the groundwater inverse problem. The IM-OGA is inherently a deterministic framework and identifies multiple large-scale parameter fields (typically head and transmissivity data are used to identify transmissivity fields). These large-scale parameter fields represent the optimal trade-offs between the different criteria (quantitative and qualitative) used in the IMOGA. This paper further extends the IMOGA to incorporate uncertainty both in the large-scale trends as well as the small-scale variability (which can not be resolved using the field data) in the parameter fields. The different parameter fields identified by the IMOGA represent the uncertainty in large-scale trends, and this uncertainty is modeled using a Bayesian approach where calibration error, regularization, and the expert's subjective preference are combined to compute a likelihood metric for each parameter field. Small-scale (stochastic) variability is modeled using a geostatistical approach and added onto the large-scale trends identified by the IMOGA. This approach is applied to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant (WIPP) case-study. Results, with and without expert interaction, are analyzed and the impact that expert judgment has on predictive uncertainty at the WIPP site is discussed. It is shown that for this case, expert interaction leads to more conservative solutions as the expert compensates for some of the lack of data and modeling approximations introduced in the formulation of the problem.

Confronting tipping points: Can multi-objective evolutionary algorithms discover pollution control tradeoffs given environmental thresholds?

“…Assuming the MOEA is functional under noisy evaluations, our analysis has shown evolutionary search with 100 SOWs can yield Lake Problem management strategies whose performance remain largely unchanged even when re-evaluated later with substantially larger draws (e.g., the 10,000 SOWs) from the lognormal distributions of the natural phosphorus inflows. Our use of noisy evolution based on 100 SOWs is very similar to a large body of work related to evolutionary optimization under uncertainty (Chan Hilton & Culver, 2005;Fu & Kapelan, 2011;Gopalakrishnan et al, 2001;Kasprzyk et al, 2009;Singh et al, 2010;Smalley et al, 2000;Wu & Whittington, 2006;Zeff et al, 2014). The Lake Problem tests the capability of MOEAs to explore an extremely high-dimensional, severely nonlinear, and stochastic environmental control problem.…”

A Hybrid Framework for Improving Recharge and Discharge Estimation for a Three‐Dimensional Groundwater Flow Model

“…As discussed previously, this hybrid procedure relies heavily on criteria for systematic selection of zones for elimination and on systematic reassignment to remaining zones of areas included in eliminated zones, although subjective expert knowledge (Singh et al 2010) was utilized. For instance, we believe a single R/D value will not be an efficient baseline value for our study as the model represents a complex 3D system.…”

Evolutionary algorithms and other metaheuristics in water resources: Current status, research challenges and future directions

“…There are recent efforts that specifically incorporate human interaction and visualization to characterize search behaviours Minsker, 2008, 2010;Castelletti et al, 2010a;Kollat and Reed, 2007b;Lotov and Miettinen, 2008;Singh et al, 2010). These studies outline techniques specifically developed for understanding, exploring and interacting with the EA search process.…”