Incorporating stakeholder perspectives into model-based scenarios: Exploring the futures of the Dutch gas sector

Abstract

Several model-based, analytical approaches have been developed recently to deal with the deep uncertainty present in situations for which futures studies are conducted. These approaches focus on covering a wide variety of scenarios and searching for robust strategies. However, they generally do not take the multiplicity of stakeholder perspectives into account in analytic terms, which could bring in diverse opinions and views, not only on possible futures but also on values and interests. In this study, we present an approach to incorporate stakeholder perspectives into model-based scenarios for exploring the future dynamics of the Dutch gas sector. The results demonstrate that the scenario space can be demarcated according to the perspectives. This allows for a systematic comparison of the perspectives and provides a basis for identification of robust strategies. Also, the analysis shows that incompatible elements between the model and perspectives, or within perspectives can be identified. This provides insights about the problem complexity and potential barriers to the futures envisioned by the perspectives. Future research can strengthen this approach by involving stakeholders in modelling and in the model-based representation of the perspective narratives to enhance learning and credibility, and can extend the analysis to identify (socially) robust policies. Highlights  Analytical scenario techniques do not explicitly consider stakeholder perspectives.  We incorporate stakeholder perspectives into model-based exploratory scenarios.  We systematically find the scenario sets that correspond to perspective narratives.  We identify the incompatibilities within perspectives and barriers to their envisioned futures.  Perspective-specific scenario sets facilitate identifying socially robust policies.

The future persona: a futures method to let your scenarios come to life

“…Second, future personas could also be instrumental in clarifying and/or communicating different perspectives of critical scenario stakeholders. Indeed, recent research has called attention to the importance of incorporating multi-stakeholders perspectives in the scenarios design process (Cairns et al , 2010; Cairns et al , 2013; Spickerman et al , 2014; Eker et al , 2017; Bourgeois et al , 2017), of the change of stakeholders’ power and dominance dynamics over time in the scenarios (Marchais-Roubelat and Roubelat, 2016) and of assessing the opinion dissent between stakeholders (Warth et al , 2013; Schippl, 2016).…”

Stay competitive in 2035: a scenario-based method to foresight in the design and manufacturing industry

“…Also, uncertainties are better understood and formulated by scenarios (Amit and Schoemaker, 1993; Chermack, 2017; Durance and Godet, 2010; Porter, 2011; Schwartz, 1996; Vecchiato, 2019; Wack, 1985). The future is rarely deterministic, but we need to be ready for it by analyzing different options (Chermack et al , 2015; Eker et al , 2017; Fuller, 2017; Jarzabkowski and Kaplan, 2015; Lord et al , 2016; Miller et al , 2015; Ramírez and Selsky, 2016; Trutnevyte et al , 2016; Varum and Melo, 2010; Veenman and Leroy, 2016).…”

Multicriteria Decision Integrated Prospective Theory Applied at Engineering Services' Company

“…Scenarios are developed in different ways. The two major categories of scenario construction approaches are intuitive (soft) methods that are based on qualitative knowledge and insight of experts or stakeholders, and formal (hard) methods that are based on best scientific knowledge and quantitative models [27].…”