2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2006.00293.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incorporating spatial autocorrelation may invert observed patterns

Abstract: Though still often neglected, spatial autocorrelation can be a serious issue in ecology because the presence of spatial autocorrelation may alter the parameter estimates and error probabilities of linear models. Here I re-analysed data from a previous study on the relationship between plant species richness and environmental correlates in Germany. While there was a positive relationship between native plant species richness and an altitudinal gradient when ignoring the presence of spatial autocorrelation, the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

14
173
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 219 publications
(188 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
14
173
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Black squares represent recorded presences. model distribution trends not related to the spatial structure in the environmental conditions (Borcard et al, 1992;Diniz-Filho et al, 2003;Kühn, 2007), but rather to historical events or to migrations from favourable areas to those less favourable but within reach (Legendre, 1993;Barbosa et al, 2001;Real et al, 2003).…”
Section: Distribution Data and Predictor Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Black squares represent recorded presences. model distribution trends not related to the spatial structure in the environmental conditions (Borcard et al, 1992;Diniz-Filho et al, 2003;Kühn, 2007), but rather to historical events or to migrations from favourable areas to those less favourable but within reach (Legendre, 1993;Barbosa et al, 2001;Real et al, 2003).…”
Section: Distribution Data and Predictor Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This phenomenon is often observed in species data, and can result from biotic pressures, such as competition or dispersal, as well as from habitat preferences within spatially structured environmental gradients [21]. Recently the statistical effect of spatial autocorrelation in ecological studies has been noted (see [22][23][24]), and methods to incorporate spatial autocorrelation into regression models have become more common [25][26][27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Residual spatial structure is often considered problematic because it can lead to inflated type I error rates (Cliff and Ord 1981;Lichstein et al 2002) or erroneous inference on model parameters (Kühn 2007). However, if the spatial environment is sufficiently represented by explanatory variables and the spatial covariance error structure is modelled appropriately to remove spatial autocorrelation from the residuals, inference on model parameters should be correct (Bannerjee et al 2004;Wagner and Fortin 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%