2008 23rd IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering - Workshops 2008
DOI: 10.1109/asew.2008.4686310
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incorporating social software into distributed agile development environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Through a number of reports by GSD practitioners in the literature, we have found that, despite the obvious difficulties, there are some instances of success of using agile practices with distributed teams [S1-S5]. But other researchers [5] still argue that the fundamental question on whether agile practices can be used in a distributed setting is still open to debate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Through a number of reports by GSD practitioners in the literature, we have found that, despite the obvious difficulties, there are some instances of success of using agile practices with distributed teams [S1-S5]. But other researchers [5] still argue that the fundamental question on whether agile practices can be used in a distributed setting is still open to debate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SOCIAL SOFTWARE "Social software is a general term encompassing a set of tools and applications that enable group interaction and computer-mediated communication" [17]. Today, the trend of growth in the usage of social software in different platforms is increasing rapidly.…”
Section: Lack Of Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these have been mentioned in [15], listing the following characteristics: Weak Ties (allow spontaneous creation of contacts between non-predetermined individuals [19]), Social Production (Enable innovative and unexpected contributions and feedback regardless of geographical location [17] [1]), Egalitarianism (The maximization of participation through the role of trust and the equal rights that the users have to contribute to eventually reach the best practice [19]), Mutual Service Provisioning (The transformation of the organization's model from a oneway service system to a service-exchange system [19]. This results in the customer having a say in the design of the products and services they receive).…”
Section: Lack Of Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is growing interest in applying agile practices in GSD projects to leverage the combined advantages of both approaches [3]. But project stockholder distribution in GSD projects is often characterized by temporal, geographical and socio-cultural distance and creates a number of challenges that may impact on project communication, coordination and collaboration processes [4]. Using agile practices in GSD projects may also exacerbate risks as agile practices are based on the philosophy of close, frequent and collocated collaboration [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, some GSD project contextual factors, for example, collaboration modes, increased number of sites, a large number of project personnel, lack of tool support etc., may also impact on project communication and collaboration processes and restricts the use of agile practices. Thus, some researchers [4] argue that the question of using agile practices in a distributed setting is still open to debate. Despite a number of risks when using agile practices in GSD, we found a few instances of success in the literature when some agile practices were used by global teams [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%