2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.quascirev.2017.06.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incorporating plant fossil data into species distribution models is not straightforward: Pitfalls and possible solutions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 86 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One solution is to evaluate predictions of past events (i.e., hindcasting) based on independent historical (e.g., harvest and museum records) or paleoecological datasets, although spatio-temporal, collector's, and taphonomic biases will complicate model calibration and validation [70]. However, for many species of management interest, such records remain unavailable or undermined by issues of spatial or temporal bias, mismatching resolutions between past and present data, and error propagation [71]. Sampling the response variable across its range of habitat variability offers an alternative.…”
Section: How Can We Best Transfer Models Through Time and Evaluate Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One solution is to evaluate predictions of past events (i.e., hindcasting) based on independent historical (e.g., harvest and museum records) or paleoecological datasets, although spatio-temporal, collector's, and taphonomic biases will complicate model calibration and validation [70]. However, for many species of management interest, such records remain unavailable or undermined by issues of spatial or temporal bias, mismatching resolutions between past and present data, and error propagation [71]. Sampling the response variable across its range of habitat variability offers an alternative.…”
Section: How Can We Best Transfer Models Through Time and Evaluate Thmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fossil data can be used to either calibrate models under past conditions or to assess the accuracy of projected models calibrated under current conditions [100]. Given that only two LGM fossil records of T. standishii are known, which cannot provide a complete picture of the species past LGM distribution [101] and is below the minimum sample size required for construction of accurate species distribution models [102,103], the latter approach was taken.…”
Section: Species Distribution Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Posterior modes (95% HPDs) of divergence time (T 3 ) for northeast and southwest Japan regions were 176,000 (150,000-2,730,000) and 250,000 (153,000-11,412,000) years ago, respectively (Table S8). Posterior modes (95% of ancestral effective population size before divergence (N ANC_ALL ) were 1050 100) and 15,400 (40-159,000), respectively. The average numbers of migrants per generation (NM) ranged between 2.91-29.84 and 0.47-3.73 in northeast and southwest Japan, respectively (Figure S7).…”
Section: Past Demographic Change and Estimates Of Migrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Projecting ENMs forward and backward in time has now received considerable attention, as models typically do not perform well under new conditions, which are known as non-analogue climate scenarios (Fitzpatrick and Hargrove 2009; McGuire and Davis 2013; Davis et al 2014; Moreno-Amat et al 2017). This problem is particularly relevant when projecting models to the past, when there was quite a bit of non-analogous climate compared with modern climates (Fitzpatrick and Hargrove 2009).…”
Section: Under the Hoodmentioning
confidence: 99%