2016
DOI: 10.1002/jpln.201500313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incorporating limited field operability and legacy soil samples in a hypercube sampling design for digital soil mapping

Abstract: Most calibration sampling designs for Digital Soil Mapping (DSM) demarcate spatially distinct sample sites. In practical applications major challenges are often limited field accessibility and the question on how to integrate legacy soil samples to cope with usually scarce resources for field sampling and laboratory analysis. The study focuses on the development and application of an efficiency improved DSM sampling design that (1) applies an optimized sample set size, (2) compensates for limited field accessi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
24
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(82 reference statements)
1
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Improving prediction accuracy might require partitioning the landscape into relatively homogeneous areas based on the covariates used as predictors. The latter could be carried out by considering land surface segmentation [100] or the conditioned Latin hypercube (cLHS) [101] using the key variables driving each soil property. Moreover, though the present study considered a vast array of predictors including topographical and spectral data, a single analysis scale was applied as generally carried out in DSM.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improving prediction accuracy might require partitioning the landscape into relatively homogeneous areas based on the covariates used as predictors. The latter could be carried out by considering land surface segmentation [100] or the conditioned Latin hypercube (cLHS) [101] using the key variables driving each soil property. Moreover, though the present study considered a vast array of predictors including topographical and spectral data, a single analysis scale was applied as generally carried out in DSM.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach used in this study to select the sampling points followed the principles proposed by Minasny and McBratney (2006). The points were selected by using cLHS with auxiliary covariates, and considering the access costs (Roudier et al, 2012;Carvalho Júnior et al, 2014;Stumpf et al, 2016). As a constraint, three buffer sizes were created in relation to roads and trails, as proposed by Carvalho Júnior et al (2014).…”
Section: Soil Dataset and Sampling Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To facilitate DSM in poorly-accessible areas, Cambule et al (2013) proposed a methodology of sampling in the area of greater accessibility, which is representative of the total area, and to evaluate the representativeness using, e.g., the similarity between the histogram of the covariates for the total and accessible areas. Other studies considered the costs of accessibility in soil sampling (Roudier et al, 2012;Carvalho Júnior et al, 2014;Stumpf et al, 2016) using a variation/optimization of the method known as conditioned Latin Hypercube Sampling (cLHS), proposed by Minasny and McBratney (2006). The cLHS is a robust tool for the allocation of sampling points by means of a set of auxiliary covariates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Conditioned Latin hypercube sampling (cLHS) provides an approach for incorporating prior auxiliary information from remote sensing instruments as well as accessibility restrictions in a sample design. cLHS is a multivariate stratified random strategy (Minasny and McBratney, ) that has been proven to be an efficient sampling method because it captures the marginal variability of several variables using a relatively small sample (Brungard and Boettinger, ; Ramirez‐Lopez et al ., ; Stumpf et al ., ; Domenech et al ., ). Roudier et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%