Abstract:Background
Input from end-users during preclinical phases can support market fit for new HIV prevention technologies. With several long-acting pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) implants in development, we aimed to understand young women’s preferences for PrEP implants to inform optimal design.
Methods
We developed a discrete choice experiment and surveyed 800 young women in Harare, Zimbabwe and Tshwane, South Africa between September–November 2020. W… Show more
“…The findings from this study further highlight that daily pills are not a preferred prevention method ( 16 , 30 , 31 ), and reiterate the need for additional types of prevention methods to be made available. Although reported by women in similar contexts to be a less important attribute of HIV prevention implants ( 35 ), our findings are in keeping with existing literature which suggests that there may be some preference for a biodegradable compared to a non-biodegradable implant, an attribute that may be linked to women's perception of method privacy or discretion ( 21 , 36 – 38 , 42 , 43 ).…”
IntroductionSouth African women bear an intersecting burden of HIV, sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and unintended pregnancy. Multipurpose prevention technologies (MPTs) are a class of products that address multiple needs and have the potential to improve uptake and use of prevention products.MethodsAnalysing survey data from 703 HIV-negative women 18–40 years in three provinces in South Africa, collected between July and November 2022, this study explores their preferences for prevention methods and factors influencing choice of hypothetical prevention methods, including MPTs. Descriptive statistics and multinomial regression analyses were conducted to determine prevention method preferences and factors associated with choosing a pill, injectable or MPT-implant type prevention method.ResultsMost women wanted to prevent HIV, STIs and pregnancy. The most important factors when choosing a prevention product were whether it provided dual and long-term protection and if side effects were manageable. If choosing only one method, half of women would choose any MPT-implant and a quarter each would choose a pill or an injectable method, with method choices differing by population group.DiscussionPrevention method choices were influenced by sexual-behavioural factors and current and prior contraceptive method use. Providing a choice of prevention methods and a population specific approach to new method development and introduction with access to accurate information could enhance their ability to fill a gap in prevention needs.
“…The findings from this study further highlight that daily pills are not a preferred prevention method ( 16 , 30 , 31 ), and reiterate the need for additional types of prevention methods to be made available. Although reported by women in similar contexts to be a less important attribute of HIV prevention implants ( 35 ), our findings are in keeping with existing literature which suggests that there may be some preference for a biodegradable compared to a non-biodegradable implant, an attribute that may be linked to women's perception of method privacy or discretion ( 21 , 36 – 38 , 42 , 43 ).…”
IntroductionSouth African women bear an intersecting burden of HIV, sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and unintended pregnancy. Multipurpose prevention technologies (MPTs) are a class of products that address multiple needs and have the potential to improve uptake and use of prevention products.MethodsAnalysing survey data from 703 HIV-negative women 18–40 years in three provinces in South Africa, collected between July and November 2022, this study explores their preferences for prevention methods and factors influencing choice of hypothetical prevention methods, including MPTs. Descriptive statistics and multinomial regression analyses were conducted to determine prevention method preferences and factors associated with choosing a pill, injectable or MPT-implant type prevention method.ResultsMost women wanted to prevent HIV, STIs and pregnancy. The most important factors when choosing a prevention product were whether it provided dual and long-term protection and if side effects were manageable. If choosing only one method, half of women would choose any MPT-implant and a quarter each would choose a pill or an injectable method, with method choices differing by population group.DiscussionPrevention method choices were influenced by sexual-behavioural factors and current and prior contraceptive method use. Providing a choice of prevention methods and a population specific approach to new method development and introduction with access to accurate information could enhance their ability to fill a gap in prevention needs.
“…The findings from this study further highlight that daily pills are not a preferred prevention method (16,30,31), and reiterate the need for additional types of prevention methods to be made available. Although reported by women in similar contexts to be a less important attribute of HIV prevention implants (35), our findings are in keeping with existing literature which suggests that there may be some preference for a biodegradable compared to a nonbiodegradable implant, an attribute that may be linked to women's perception of method privacy or discretion (21, 36-38, 42, 43).…”
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.