2004
DOI: 10.1080/0968759042000235307
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incorporating disabled students within an inclusive higher education environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
127
0
24

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 174 publications
(164 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
6
127
0
24
Order By: Relevance
“…Scholars and policymakers alike have discussed the importance of widening participation in tertiary education (e.g., Bradley & Miller, 2010) and of developing campus cultures and pedagogical approaches that value, respect, and work for a wide variety of learners (e.g., Grace & Gravestock, 2009;Ouellett, 2005). Much of this scholarship has focused on the relative accessibility of teaching and learning for students with disabilities in particular (e.g., Fuller, Bradley, & Healey, 2004;Riddell, Weedon, Fuller, Healey, Hurst, Kelly, & Piggott, 2007), often considering inclusive pedagogical strategies such as universal design for learning (Burgstahler & Cory, 2009). Considerable attention has also been afforded to the ways in which teaching and learning intersect with ethnicity, socio-economic status, religion, and other axes of identity (e.g., Cole & Ahmadi, 2010;Devlin, Kift, Nelson, Smith, & McKay, 2012;Ladson-Billings, 2014 remains unresolved in educational research and largely unrealized in practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars and policymakers alike have discussed the importance of widening participation in tertiary education (e.g., Bradley & Miller, 2010) and of developing campus cultures and pedagogical approaches that value, respect, and work for a wide variety of learners (e.g., Grace & Gravestock, 2009;Ouellett, 2005). Much of this scholarship has focused on the relative accessibility of teaching and learning for students with disabilities in particular (e.g., Fuller, Bradley, & Healey, 2004;Riddell, Weedon, Fuller, Healey, Hurst, Kelly, & Piggott, 2007), often considering inclusive pedagogical strategies such as universal design for learning (Burgstahler & Cory, 2009). Considerable attention has also been afforded to the ways in which teaching and learning intersect with ethnicity, socio-economic status, religion, and other axes of identity (e.g., Cole & Ahmadi, 2010;Devlin, Kift, Nelson, Smith, & McKay, 2012;Ladson-Billings, 2014 remains unresolved in educational research and largely unrealized in practice.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A fogyatékosokkal szembeni attitűdöt leggyakrabban attitűdskálás méréssel -pl. ATDP, ORM, SACIE -(Szegő, 2008;Forlin, Loreman, Sharma és Earle, 2007;Pető és Czeglédi, 2012) vagy kvalitatív interjús vizsgálatokkal végzik (Holloway, 2001;Fuller, Bradley és Healey, 2004).…”
Section: Vizsgálati Előzményekunclassified
“…Scholars categorize health impairments as "apparent" and "non-apparent", "visible" and "invisible" and "non-cognitive" and "cognitive" to separate the diverse experiences of mental versus physical impairments (Adams & Proctor, 2010; Frazier, Youngstom, Glutting, & Watkins, 2007;Fuller, Bradley, & Healey, 2004;Fuller et al, 2009;Mullins & Preyde, 2013;Murray, Lombardi, & Kosty, 2014;Olney & Brockelman, 2003;Wessel, Jones, Markle, & Westfall, 2009). ii Physical impairments are easier to document and are perceived of as more legitimate and deserving of accommodations in college classrooms (Chambers et al, 2013;Upton & Harper, 2002 …”
Section: Signals Shape Educational Expectationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Students with physical impairments are more likely to receive accommodations (Chambers et al, 2013;Fuller et al, 2004) and report being better adjusted to the college environment than students with mental impairments (Adams & Proctor, 2010;Fuller et al, 2009;Murray et al, 2014). Students with invisible impairments, such as depression, ADD or a learning disability, can pass as "normal" and avoid some discrimination from faculty and peers, but passing as normal does not eliminate the symptoms of impairments and validating invisible impairments is challenging (Johnson, 2006;Mullins & Preyde, 2013).…”
Section: The Role Of Social Integration and Enrollment Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%