Incorporating climate change into invasive species management: insights from managers

Abstract

Invasive alien species are likely to interact with climate change, thus necessitating management that proactively addresses both global changes. However, invasive species managers' concerns about the effects of climate change, the degree to which they incorporate climate change into their management, and what stops them from doing so remain unknown. Therefore, we surveyed natural resource managers addressing invasive species across the U.S. about their priorities, concerns, and management strategies in a changing climate. Of the 211 managers we surveyed, most were very concerned about the influence of climate change on invasive species management, but their organizations were significantly less so. Managers reported that lack of funding and personnel limited their ability to effectively manage invasive species, while lack of information limited their consideration of climate change in decision-making. Additionally, managers prioritized research that identifies range-shifting invasive species and native communities resilient to invasions and climate change. Managers also reported that this information would be most effectively communicated through conversations, research summaries, and meetings/symposia. Despite the need for more information, 65% of managers incorporate climate change into their invasive species management through strategic planning, preventative management, changing treatment and control, and increasing education and outreach. These results show the potential for incorporating climate change into management, but also highlight a clear and pressing need for more targeted research, accessible science communication, and two-way dialogue between researchers and managers focused on invasive species and climate change.

Measures to Control Invasive Crayfish Species in Switzerland: A Success Story?

“…It is important that measures to control invasive species are carried out and agreed nationwide and across countries to prevent spread from places where no measures are taken. This is always a difficult issue to overcome when trying to control an invasive species of animal or plant, as land or municipal boundaries set by humans do not apply to them (Fernandes et al, 2019;Beaury et al, 2020). The development of a common strategy based on the experience gained to date can significantly increase success of invasive species eradication as well as saving money, the environment and the species inhabiting it.…”

Biotic resistance to invasion is ubiquitous across ecosystems of the United States

“…This strategy aims to prevent invasions during the establishment stage – before some non‐native species spread (Blackburn et al ) and eradication becomes less likely. Nonetheless, natural resource managers consistently report that they are losing ground against invasions (Beaury et al ) and invasive plant management continues to absorb time and resources (Pimentel et al ). As these invasions advance the global decline in native biodiversity (IPBES ), we must identify and validate resource‐effective conservation and restoration strategies that limit the success of non‐native species during all stages of the invasion process.…”

Restoring functionally diverse communities enhances invasion resistance in a freshwater wetland

“…Such test becomes increasingly relevant in a context where broad scale reorganization of species within communities-associated with unprecedented rates of species introductions and climate change-is to be expected and resources for repeated management interventions are scarce (Beaury et al, 2020).…”