“…It is wellestablished fact that a detailed knowledge of the morphologic dimensions, location and asymmetry of normal auricle is essential for the diagnosis of congenital abnormalities and syndromes, forensic investigations and for the ergonomic design of hearing aids (Coward et al, 2000;Purkait & Singh, 2007;Tatlisumak et al, 2015). Therefore, a large number of anthropometric studies of normal auricle have been assessed in various populations, for instance, Koreans (Jung & Jung, 2003;Kang et al, 2006), Sudanese Arabs (Ahmed & Omer), Chinese (Liu, 2008;Wang et al, 2011) Indians (Purkait & Singh;Sharma et al, 2007;Purkait, 2013), Italians (GualdiRusso, 1998;Ferrario et al, 1999;Sforza et al, 2009), Britons (Coward et al; Alexander et al), Turks (Bozkir et al, 2006;Barut & Aktunc, 2006), Americans (Brucker et al, 2003), Germans (Niemitz et al, 2007), and Japanese (Asai et al, 1996). The shape, dimension and orientation of each auricle is as individual as a fingerprint (Murgod et al, 2013), but it is possible to make some generalisations from the studies mentioned above.…”