2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2006.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incorporating anthropometry into design of ear-related products

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
48
0
5

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
6
48
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…In another study on an Indian male population, the length and width of the earlobe were larger on the left side in 21-40 years age group (Sharma et al, 2007). Auricle length was larger at the left side in a Taiwanese population (Liu, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In another study on an Indian male population, the length and width of the earlobe were larger on the left side in 21-40 years age group (Sharma et al, 2007). Auricle length was larger at the left side in a Taiwanese population (Liu, 2008).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There were fine and detailed studies on morphometry of the auricle (Farkas et al;Ferrario et al, 1999;Brucker et al;Kalcioglu et al;Barut & Aktunc, 2006;Bozkir et al;Purkait & Singh, 2007) but studies investigating the asymmetry of auricle were very rare (Jung & Jung, 2003;Liu, 2008) and to our best knowledge there was only one study investigating the relation of auricle asymmetry and hand preference (Jung & Jung). The aims of this study were to determine various morphometric measurements of right and left auricles, to investigate asymmetry and its relation with handedness in both sexes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ear length of a normal adult is ranging from 55.0 mm to 65.0 mm while the ear width is ranging from 50% to 60% of its length (Jung & Jung 2003;Kalcioglu., et al 2003) [3,4]. However, the increase in ear dimension at different progressing of age periods is basically due to growth, gravitational effects and diminutive tensile strength of connective tissue (Liu 2008) [5]. Although this might affect the chance of finding a print in a database after a long period of time, it is unlikely to make the ears less unique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is wellestablished fact that a detailed knowledge of the morphologic dimensions, location and asymmetry of normal auricle is essential for the diagnosis of congenital abnormalities and syndromes, forensic investigations and for the ergonomic design of hearing aids (Coward et al, 2000;Purkait & Singh, 2007;Tatlisumak et al, 2015). Therefore, a large number of anthropometric studies of normal auricle have been assessed in various populations, for instance, Koreans (Jung & Jung, 2003;Kang et al, 2006), Sudanese Arabs (Ahmed & Omer), Chinese (Liu, 2008;Wang et al, 2011) Indians (Purkait & Singh;Sharma et al, 2007;Purkait, 2013), Italians (GualdiRusso, 1998;Ferrario et al, 1999;Sforza et al, 2009), Britons (Coward et al; Alexander et al), Turks (Bozkir et al, 2006;Barut & Aktunc, 2006), Americans (Brucker et al, 2003), Germans (Niemitz et al, 2007), and Japanese (Asai et al, 1996). The shape, dimension and orientation of each auricle is as individual as a fingerprint (Murgod et al, 2013), but it is possible to make some generalisations from the studies mentioned above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%