2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.04.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inconvenience cost of waste disposal behavior in South Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
1
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
21
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The results confirmed that the perceived benefit played a positive role, and the perceived cost played a negative role in the WSB. This is consistent with the studies by Li et al [ 31 ] and Lee et al [ 36 ]. Furthermore, perceived benefits and perceived cost have different effects on WSB in high- and low-income groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The results confirmed that the perceived benefit played a positive role, and the perceived cost played a negative role in the WSB. This is consistent with the studies by Li et al [ 31 ] and Lee et al [ 36 ]. Furthermore, perceived benefits and perceived cost have different effects on WSB in high- and low-income groups.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…The time cost was negatively correlated with waste classification behaviors at the 1% level, which indicated that time cost was a barrier for farmers to participate in waste classification. The probability of farmers with higher perceived time cost to participate in waste classification was 0.78 times that of the lower group, and H2a was verified [ 17 , 36 ]. Learning cost had no significant effect on waste classification behaviors.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…To overcome this problem, a researcher may consider using a latent class logit model [50,51] or mixed logit model [52,53]. In this study, we used the mixed logit model, since it can analyze the preference heterogeneity of respondents using various types of distributions [45].…”
Section: Model Specificationmentioning
confidence: 99%