Our system is currently under heavy load due to increased usage. We're actively working on upgrades to improve performance. Thank you for your patience.
2014
DOI: 10.1177/1474515114524866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inconsistent measurement of acute coronary syndrome patients’ pre-hospital delay in research: A review of the literature

Abstract: We found few and variable operational definitions of PHD, despite American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association recommendations to report specific intervals. Worryingly, definitions of symptom onset, the most elusive component of PHD to establish, are uncommon. We recommend that researchers (a) report two PHD delay intervals (onset to decision to seek care, and decision to seek care to hospital arrival), and (b) develop, validate and use a definition of symptom onset. This will increase clarity and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 129 publications
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when we compared our times with those in earlier Australian reports of patient and total prehospital delay, we saw no reduction over the last 2 decades. This may be explained by differences in the definitions of the timeframes and starting points between studies . We did note an upward trend in Australian data for the percentage of patients who (1) decided to seek medical attention within 1 hour (38% in 1988, 42% in 1989 precampaign, 45% in 1989 postcampaign, to 47% in our 2013‐2014 study) and (2) who presented to hospital within 2 hours of symptom onset (28% in 1995 to 34% in our study).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…However, when we compared our times with those in earlier Australian reports of patient and total prehospital delay, we saw no reduction over the last 2 decades. This may be explained by differences in the definitions of the timeframes and starting points between studies . We did note an upward trend in Australian data for the percentage of patients who (1) decided to seek medical attention within 1 hour (38% in 1988, 42% in 1989 precampaign, 45% in 1989 postcampaign, to 47% in our 2013‐2014 study) and (2) who presented to hospital within 2 hours of symptom onset (28% in 1995 to 34% in our study).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…However, no studies linked patient related delay as an inhibiting factor in achieving RT within 120 min. Acute symptom onset to 12‐lead ECG is an unreliable variable because the exact timing of acute symptom onset can be difficult to recall for patients (Koul et al, ; Mackay et al, ). We defined acute symptom onset as the time the patient decided immediate medical attention was needed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prehospital interval between symptom onset and initiation of treatment can be divided into two intervals: patient-related and system-related. Overall, the prehospital interval includes the time from symptom onset to arrival at a hospital or similar healthcare facility (Mackay et al, 2014). Mackay et al (2014) conceptualized treatment seeking to include the portion within the prehospital interval that is specifically attributable to the patient's decisions and actions, and does not include prehospital system delays (e.g., emergency medical systems).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, and perhaps the greatest benefit, obtaining ethnicity data through self-report. Lastly, I believe the data collected about treatment seeking allowed us to accurately define the time of symptom onset and therefore report a discrete time interval (the time from symptom onset to the occurrence of appropriate treatment seeking), which is the recommended format for reporting (Mackay et al, 2014;Moser et al, 2006).…”
Section: Strengthsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation