2015
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1447
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Inconsistencies among secondary sources of Chukar Partridge (Alectoris chukar) introductions to the United States

Abstract: The propagule pressure hypothesis asserts that the number of individuals released is the key determinant of whether an introduction will succeed or not. It remains to be shown whether propagule pressure is more important than either species-level or site-level factors in determining the fate of an introduction. Studies claiming to show that propagule pressure is the primary determinant of introduction success must assume that the historical record as reported by secondary sources is complete and accurate. Here… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the data used on this analysis included a large number of Galliform birds (20.2% of 1,530 records). Managers often introduced these birds into previously established populations (Banks, 1981; Moulton, Cropper & Broz, 2015, 2018; Moulton & Cropper, 2014b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, the data used on this analysis included a large number of Galliform birds (20.2% of 1,530 records). Managers often introduced these birds into previously established populations (Banks, 1981; Moulton, Cropper & Broz, 2015, 2018; Moulton & Cropper, 2014b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We adopted this procedure because of the substantial uncertainties in propagule sizes per release (Moulton, Cropper & Broz, 2015). Additionally, previous analyses that used extremely large releases compiled over many species, over long spans of time and spatial scale inflate the number of degrees of freedom leading to spurious results.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The native distribution range of this species extends from the Balkans to eastern Asia [12], with 14 morphological subspecies [13] clustering into two well-distinct genetic lineages forming an eastern and a western clade separated by mountain ranges from Altay to Himalayas [14,15]. Eastern clade chukars are also raised in farms for hunting and meat production [16,17]. Moreover, European game farms breed A. rufa x A. chukar [18][19][20] and A. graeca x A. chukar producing hybrids [11,21] that are released into the wild for shooting purposes with the aim of supplementing natural populations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Chukars have been studied extensively (e.g., Nagel, 1945;Alcorn & Richardson, 1951;Barnett, 1952;Galbreath & Moreland, 1953;Christensen, 1954Christensen, , 1970Christensen, , 1996Bohl, 1957;Harper, Harry & Bailey, 1958;Tomlinson, 1960;Moulton, Cropper & Broz, 2015;Moulton et al, 2018;Moulton & Cropper, 2016, little information exists for quantitative comparisons of locations deemed suitable versus not suitable. With this in mind, the goal of our study was to develop quantitative models using machine learning algorithms to assess environmental factors of sites in the Chukar's native range, and to determine/predict most suitable sites for introductions in the 48 contiguous states of the US.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%