2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.09.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incongruent multisensory stimuli alter bodily self-consciousness: Evidence from a first-person perspective experience

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants were asked to estimate their height, and the width and the circumference of three different body parts (shoulders, abdomen, and hips), at three time points: before the VR-FBI, representing the baseline, and after both the two (synchronous and asynchronous) conditions of visuo-tactile stimulation. Moreover, in line with the traditional literature [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,20,21], we adopted the Embodiment Questionnaire [1]: this questionnaire, administered after both stimulation conditions, allows to measure the strength of illusion in terms of: (1) Ownership over the virtual body; (2) Self-location , i.e., being in the same location of the virtual body; and (3) Sense of agency over the virtual body.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Participants were asked to estimate their height, and the width and the circumference of three different body parts (shoulders, abdomen, and hips), at three time points: before the VR-FBI, representing the baseline, and after both the two (synchronous and asynchronous) conditions of visuo-tactile stimulation. Moreover, in line with the traditional literature [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,20,21], we adopted the Embodiment Questionnaire [1]: this questionnaire, administered after both stimulation conditions, allows to measure the strength of illusion in terms of: (1) Ownership over the virtual body; (2) Self-location , i.e., being in the same location of the virtual body; and (3) Sense of agency over the virtual body.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This aspect should be taken in account when a task about the estimation of body parts or whole body is chosen as measure of the illusion. Moreover, it should be noted that in the Body Size Estimation Task [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20], participants are explicitly required to estimate the horizontal distance between the left and right side of each body part placing adhesive stickers on the wall. To avoid that they used their body as a reference for giving a correct body size estimation, we explicitly required participants to do not look at their own body during the task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For instance, Projected hand illusion 34,35 uses the videos of participant's own hand that are projected on a table in front of them, either in live timing, or with a delay (which creates asynchronous stimulation). In more immersive setups, such as the MIRAGE system, the videos of the own hand are projected on the same plane as the real hand 18 , or presented in a head-mounted display (HMD) 36,37 . Moreover, other variations of the experimental procedure used augmented- 38 and mixed reality 10 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, being embodied in full virtual child body can modulate the subsequent real speaking (Tajadura-Jiménez et al, 2017). Five studies investigated the influence of a full virtual body illusion from a 1PP: (1) to induce real body postural discomfort (Bergström et al, 2016); (2) to stimulate some motor responses such as the walking illusion (Kokkinara et al, 2016); (3) for motor errors monitoring (Pavone et al, 2016;Valzolgher et al, 2018); or (4) to incorporate robotic hands into the own body through synchronous VMC controlled by a brain machine interface (Alimardani et al, 2013). Serino and colleagues (2018) observed that there are age related changes when perceiving a virtual FBOI, where participants between 26-to-55-year-old were more resistant to changes induced by the bodily illusion, compared to a young group of people (19-to-25 years old) (S. Serino et al, 2018).…”
Section: Bi To Modulate Body Representation Evidence From Healthymentioning
confidence: 99%