2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1526-4610.2009.01389.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Incomplete Posterior Circle of Willis: A Risk Factor for Migraine?

Abstract: Despite some methodological limitations, our results showed that incomplete posterior CW was associated with migraine.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

5
31
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
(28 reference statements)
5
31
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is due to the fact that each particular evaluation technique has different characteristics and limitations [5,6,9]. Furthermore, it should be noted that a number of previously published studies were carried out on patients with cerebrovascular disorders [3,6,8,11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is due to the fact that each particular evaluation technique has different characteristics and limitations [5,6,9]. Furthermore, it should be noted that a number of previously published studies were carried out on patients with cerebrovascular disorders [3,6,8,11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These incidents may result from disorders such as occlusive disease [8,14] or from surgical procedures, for instance aortic dissection (intraoperative ischaemia) [15]. Additionally, the role of the CW in migraine [3] and aneurysm development [2] has been widely studied. In the light of the CW's key function in pathological processes, the need for thorough investigation of the appearance of different variants of the circle is understandable.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Cavestro et al [6], while using similar criteria to the above-mentioned studies, also included a slightly broader definition of variations, including variations such as displacement of the vessels, leading to potential over-counting of relevant anatomical variations. Bugnicourt et al [5] did not consider vessel diameter as a factor in determining the presence of a complete or incomplete COW, counting only the presence or absence of a vessel. This may have resulted in undercounting of variations as compared to other studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3] This might suggest that such an anatomic anomaly is a risk factor for developing migraine.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%